Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PMAQX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Buy and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 31.3B vs. LCBSX (3.42B). PMAQX pays higher dividends than LCBSX: PMAQX (0.20) vs LCBSX (0.00). LCBSX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: LCBSX (12 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). LCBSX (0) and PMAQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. PMAQX (10.56). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 69.80 vs. LCBSX (65.68).
| LCBSX | PMAQX | LCBSX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.59 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.59 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.688 | 4.526 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.42B | 31.3B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 10.56 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.90 | 47.11 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.68 | 69.80 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers