Ad is loading...
LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PMAQX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Hold and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 29.8B vs. LCBSX (3.68B). PMAQX pays higher dividends than LCBSX: PMAQX (0.10) vs LCBSX (0.00). LCBSX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: LCBSX (12 years) vs PMAQX (8 years). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. PMAQX (10.10). LCBSX (0) and PMAQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.15 vs. PMAQX (19.12). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 82.12 vs. PMAQX (43.62).
| LCBSX | PMAQX | LCBSX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.813 | 3.428 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.68B | 29.8B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.15 | 19.12 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.84 | 26.14 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.12 | 43.62 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 260.36 | N/A | - |