Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PMAQX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Hold and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. LCBSX (3.36B). PMAQX pays higher dividends than LCBSX: PMAQX (0.19) vs LCBSX (0.00). LCBSX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: LCBSX (13 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). LCBSX (0) and PMAQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.72 vs. PMAQX (12.32). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.88 vs. PMAQX (59.23).
| LCBSX | PMAQX | LCBSX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.59 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.59 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.855 | 3.607 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.36B | 30.6B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.72 | 12.32 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.97 | 53.24 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.88 | 59.23 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 226.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement