Ad is loading...
LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PMAQX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Buy and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 28.9B vs. LCBSX (3.08B). PMAQX pays higher dividends than LCBSX: PMAQX (0.20) vs LCBSX (0.00). LCBSX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: LCBSX (12 years) vs PMAQX (8 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.60). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). LCBSX (0) and PMAQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. LCBSX (5.10). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 74.57 vs. PMAQX (70.74).
| LCBSX | PMAQX | LCBSX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.60 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.60 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.531 | -2.980 | 387% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 28.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.10 | 7.10 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.34 | 22.87 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.57 | 70.74 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...