Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs VMGMX
LCBSX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs VMGMX
LCBSX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. VMGMX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Hold and VMGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 33.5B vs. LCBSX (3.29B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than LCBSX: VMGMX (0.61) vs LCBSX (0.00). LCBSX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: LCBSX (14 years) vs VMGMX (15 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. VMGMX (17.00). LCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: LCBSX (0) vs VMGMX (3000). LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. VMGMX (9.14). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.46 vs. LCBSX (14.63).
| LCBSX | VMGMX | LCBSX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.07 | 1,957% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.07 | 1,957% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.146 | 12.002 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.29B | 33.5B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | 9.14 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.98 | 58.02 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.63 | 31.46 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 309.56 | 195.91 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement