Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs VMGMX
LCBSX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs VMGMX
LCBSX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. VMGMX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a StrongBuy and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 33.8B vs. LCBSX (3.27B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than LCBSX: VMGMX (0.62) vs LCBSX (0.00). LCBSX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: LCBSX (14 years) vs VMGMX (15 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. VMGMX (17.00). LCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: LCBSX (0) vs VMGMX (3000). LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. VMGMX (8.95). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.73 vs. LCBSX (11.95).
| LCBSX | VMGMX | LCBSX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.07 | 1,957% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.07 | 1,957% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.924 | 6.514 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.27B | 33.8B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.92 | 8.95 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.29 | 48.23 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.95 | 30.73 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 327.86 | 198.38 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement