T | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LCF | T | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 64% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LCF and WBD have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCF and WBD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCF | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| WBD - LCF | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FOXA - LCF | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.19% | ||
| T - LCF | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| CMCSA - LCF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| UNH - LCF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, T has been closely correlated with VZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if T jumps, then VZ could also see price increases.