T | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LCF | T | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 61% | 13 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 64% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LCF and WBD have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCF and WBD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WBD - LCF | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| FOXA - LCF | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
| T - LCF | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| DD - LCF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| GOOG - LCF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, T has been closely correlated with VZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if T jumps, then VZ could also see price increases.