Ad is loading...
LCFLX vs RMEBX
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$11.53
Change-$0.16 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.88M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. LCFLX (30.9M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMEBX (1.18) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LCFLX (2.67) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.38 vs. LCFLX (-5.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. LCFLX (7.64).
| LCFLX | RMEBX | LCFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.07 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 1.07 | 250% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.008 | -7.747 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9M | 92.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | -4.38 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.27 | -1.07 | 2,073% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.64 | 44.36 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers