Ad is loading...
LCFLX vs RMEBX
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$13.76
Change+$0.16 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.44M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.36
Change+$0.39 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.76B
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LCFLX (33.4M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMEBX (1.54) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.85 vs. RMEBX (13.64). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.04 vs. LCFLX (-7.59).
| LCFLX | RMEBX | LCFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.696 | 4.481 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.4M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.85 | 13.64 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.17 | 15.51 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.59 | 44.04 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...