Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$16.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.89
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LDFOX (2.05B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.11) vs LDFOX (0.99). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LDFOX (6.96) and RMEBX (6.81) have marching annual gain over last year. LDFOX (54.44) and RMEBX (53.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.098 | 11.509 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.11 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 6.81 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.68 | 28.69 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.44 | 53.09 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement