Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$15.62
Change-$0.15 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LDFOX (1.92B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.16) vs LDFOX (1.04). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. LDFOX (5.25). RMEBX (58.69) and LDFOX (55.99) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.759 | 5.923 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.16 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.25 | 8.54 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.56 | 27.89 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.99 | 58.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement