Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$17.48
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LDFOX (2.1B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LDFOX (0.94). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LDFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.08 vs. RMEBX (7.29). LDFOX (62.30) and RMEBX (59.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.550 | 14.812 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.05 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.08 | 7.29 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.52 | 43.24 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.30 | 59.63 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement