Ad is loading...
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$14.50
Change+$0.25 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LDFOX (1.74B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.18) vs LDFOX (1.05). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. LDFOX (-3.53). RMEBX (52.21) and LDFOX (51.68) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.166 | -2.724 | 263% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 95.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.53 | 1.74 | -203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.74 | 5.82 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.68 | 52.21 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...