Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$16.36
Change+$0.11 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LDFOX (2B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.12) vs LDFOX (1.01). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. LDFOX (9.65). LDFOX (62.90) and RMEBX (60.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.580 | 9.495 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.12 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 11.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.84 | 28.70 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.90 | 60.65 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement