Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$15.67
Change+$0.15 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.60
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LDFVX (1.94B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.16) vs LDFVX (0.82). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.95). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. LDFVX (6.41). RMEBX (62.71) and LDFVX (60.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.986 | 7.315 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.16 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 9.50 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.50 | 25.88 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.42 | 62.71 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.34 | 74.51 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement