Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$15.30
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LDFVX (1.92B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.16) vs LDFVX (0.82). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.95). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. LDFVX (5.04). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. LDFVX (43.56).
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.725 | 5.349 | 32% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.16 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 8.30 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.39 | 17.96 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 49.85 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.85 | 68.21 | 31% |