Ad is loading...
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$14.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. LDFVX (1.77B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.18) vs LDFVX (0.83). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.94). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. LDFVX (0.16). LDFVX return over 5 years is better than : 51.97 vs. RMEBX (47.73).
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.972 | -3.381 | 177% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 96.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.18 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | 3.48 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.84 | 5.34 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.97 | 47.73 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.38 | 51.61 | 22% |