Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$16.82
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.45
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LDFVX (2.09B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.09) vs LDFVX (0.76). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.95). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). LDFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.48 vs. RMEBX (6.95). LDFVX (59.71) and RMEBX (59.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.413 | 12.793 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.09 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.48 | 6.95 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.20 | 33.52 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.71 | 59.02 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.47 | 94.45 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement