Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$15.83
Change+$0.05 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.62
Change+$0.26 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.17B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. LDFVX (1.97B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.12) vs LDFVX (0.79). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.95). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. LDFVX (3.75). RMEBX (55.63) and LDFVX (53.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.711 | 9.183 | 51% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 108B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.12 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.75 | 7.69 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.90 | 29.84 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.23 | 55.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.13 | 74.05 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement