Ad is loading...
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$15.26
Change+$0.34 (+2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.49
Change+$1.20 (+2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LDFVX (1.87B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.21) vs LDFVX (0.85). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.95). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.95 vs. LDFVX (1.13). LDFVX return over 5 years is better than : 66.09 vs. RMEBX (59.20).
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.995 | 0.984 | -101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.21 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.13 | 3.95 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.75 | 15.77 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.09 | 59.20 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.59 | 57.45 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...