LEA
Price
$105.29
Change
-$0.34 (-0.32%)
Updated
Sep 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.62B
50 days until earnings call
MGA
Price
$46.86
Change
+$0.48 (+1.03%)
Updated
Sep 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.06B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEA vs MGA

Header iconLEA vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts LEA vs MGABanner chart's image
Lear
Price$105.29
Change-$0.34 (-0.32%)
Volume$3.29K
Capitalization5.62B
Magna International
Price$46.86
Change+$0.48 (+1.03%)
Volume$23.63K
Capitalization13.06B
LEA vs MGA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEA vs. MGA commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEA is a StrongBuy and MGA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (LEA: $105.63 vs. MGA: $46.38)
Brand notoriety: LEA and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEA: 135% vs. MGA: 78%
Market capitalization -- LEA: $5.62B vs. MGA: $13.06B
LEA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $5.62B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $13.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $91.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the long-term than MGA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the short-term than MGA.

Price Growth

LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -4.88% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

MGA is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.65% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($13.1B) has a higher market cap than LEA($5.62B). LEA has higher P/E ratio than MGA: LEA (14.94) vs MGA (10.89). MGA YTD gains are higher at: 15.219 vs. LEA (14.252). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.04B vs. LEA (1.26B). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. LEA (888M). LEA has less debt than MGA: LEA (2.79B) vs MGA (8.12B). MGA has higher revenues than LEA: MGA (41.6B) vs LEA (17.3B).
LEAMGALEA / MGA
Capitalization5.62B13.1B43%
EBITDA1.26B4.04B31%
Gain YTD14.25215.21994%
P/E Ratio14.9410.89137%
Revenue17.3B41.6B42%
Total Cash888M1.54B58%
Total Debt2.79B8.12B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEA vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
LEA
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2974
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9995
SMR RATING
1..100
7770
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2156
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (13) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (20). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (99). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (70) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (77). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (49). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGA (56). This means that LEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEAMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVQQ26.271.20
+4.77%
WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF
XTR30.030.42
+1.42%
Global X S&P 500® Tail Risk ETF
XISE30.31-0.03
-0.08%
FT Vest US Eq Buf & Prm IncETF-Sept
JPIB48.99-0.06
-0.13%
JPMorgan International Bond Opps ETF
PJP92.00-1.64
-1.75%
Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
-3.25%
ADNT - LEA
78%
Closely correlated
-2.64%
MGA - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
VC - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
BWA - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
APTV - LEA
71%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
-0.88%
LEA - MGA
78%
Closely correlated
-3.25%
ADNT - MGA
74%
Closely correlated
-2.64%
ALV - MGA
71%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
BWA - MGA
71%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
THRM - MGA
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
More