LEA
Price
$90.54
Change
-$0.60 (-0.66%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
8.26B
74 days until earnings call
MGDDY
Price
$19.00
Change
+$0.14 (+0.74%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
23.43B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEA vs MGDDY

Header iconLEA vs MGDDY Comparison
Open Charts LEA vs MGDDYBanner chart's image
Lear
Price$90.54
Change-$0.60 (-0.66%)
Volume$729.31K
Capitalization8.26B
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
Price$19.00
Change+$0.14 (+0.74%)
Volume$306.85K
Capitalization23.43B
LEA vs MGDDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGDDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEA vs. MGDDY commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEA is a Hold and MGDDY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LEA: $90.54 vs. MGDDY: $19.00)
Brand notoriety: LEA and MGDDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEA: 99% vs. MGDDY: 175%
Market capitalization -- LEA: $8.26B vs. MGDDY: $23.43B
LEA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.26B. MGDDY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $23.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGDDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGDDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGDDY is a better buy in the long-term than LEA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGDDY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MGDDY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGDDY is a better buy in the short-term than LEA.

Price Growth

LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.43% price change this week, while MGDDY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEA is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

MGDDY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.16% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGDDY($23.4B) has a higher market cap than LEA($8.26B). LEA has higher P/E ratio than MGDDY: LEA (14.91) vs MGDDY (8.90). MGDDY YTD gains are higher at: 20.578 vs. LEA (-3.604). MGDDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.41B vs. LEA (1.48B). MGDDY has more cash in the bank: 3.42B vs. LEA (1.2B). LEA has less debt than MGDDY: LEA (2.92B) vs MGDDY (7.95B). MGDDY has higher revenues than LEA: MGDDY (29.4B) vs LEA (23.5B).
LEAMGDDYLEA / MGDDY
Capitalization8.26B23.4B35%
EBITDA1.48B5.41B27%
Gain YTD-3.60420.578-18%
P/E Ratio14.918.90168%
Revenue23.5B29.4B80%
Total Cash1.2B3.42B35%
Total Debt2.92B7.95B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEA vs MGDDY: Fundamental Ratings
LEA
MGDDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7131
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9639
SMR RATING
1..100
6796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7653
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGDDY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (14) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MGDDY’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEA (96) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MGDDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's SMR Rating (67) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGDDY (96) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to MGDDY’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (54) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MGDDY’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDY's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (76) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MGDDY’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEAMGDDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGDDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KXI66.37N/A
N/A
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
FID18.56N/A
N/A
First Trust S&P Int Div Aristocrats ETF
QTAP40.18N/A
N/A
Innovator Growth-100 Acltd Ps ETF™ April
DFAX28.23-0.02
-0.07%
Dimensional World ex US Core Eq 2 ETF
FCAL47.70-0.17
-0.36%
First Trust California Muni Hi Inc ETF

MGDDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGDDY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGDDY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGDDY
1D Price
Change %
MGDDY100%
+0.74%
VLEEY - MGDDY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
LEA - MGDDY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
CTTAY - MGDDY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
MGA - MGDDY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ADNT - MGDDY
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More