LEA
Price
$102.69
Change
+$0.11 (+0.11%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.32B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLR
Price
$36.44
Change
+$0.28 (+0.77%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
416.56M
112 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEA vs MLR

Header iconLEA vs MLR Comparison
Open Charts LEA vs MLRBanner chart's image
Lear
Price$102.69
Change+$0.11 (+0.11%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization5.32B
Miller Industries
Price$36.44
Change+$0.28 (+0.77%)
Volume$600
Capitalization416.56M
LEA vs MLR Comparison Chart in %
LEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEA vs. MLR commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEA is a Hold and MLR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (LEA: $102.58 vs. MLR: $36.16)
Brand notoriety: LEA and MLR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEA: 128% vs. MLR: 106%
Market capitalization -- LEA: $5.33B vs. MLR: $416.56M
LEA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $5.33B. MLR’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $416.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the long-term than MLR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LEA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLR is a better buy in the short-term than LEA.

Price Growth

LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -6.26% price change this week, while MLR (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -5.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEA is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

MLR is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.39% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($5.32B) has a higher market cap than MLR($417M). MLR has higher P/E ratio than LEA: MLR (14.12) vs LEA (12.51). LEA YTD gains are higher at: 10.953 vs. MLR (-43.912). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.38B vs. MLR (70.1M). MLR has less debt than LEA: MLR (55.4M) vs LEA (2.79B). LEA has higher revenues than MLR: LEA (23B) vs MLR (976M).
LEAMLRLEA / MLR
Capitalization5.32B417M1,276%
EBITDA1.38B70.1M1,970%
Gain YTD10.953-43.912-25%
P/E Ratio12.5114.1289%
Revenue23B976M2,357%
Total Cash1.01BN/A-
Total Debt2.79B55.4M5,038%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEA vs MLR: Fundamental Ratings
LEA
MLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7659
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
7266
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5183
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2121
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (19) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLR (95) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew significantly faster than MLR’s over the last 12 months.

MLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as LEA (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MLR’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

MLR's SMR Rating (66) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as LEA (72) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MLR’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MLR (83) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to MLR’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MLR (21) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to MLR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEAMLR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LKEQX40.00N/A
N/A
LKCM Equity
EISGX16.06N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Small-Cap I
PJHRX36.34N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences R
PWJQX34.65N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison International Opps R6
CIPTX12.10N/A
N/A
Champlain Strategic Focus Institutional

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
+0.69%
VC - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
MGA - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
APTV - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
BWA - LEA
76%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
ALV - LEA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
More