The 50-day moving average for LEA moved below the 200-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LEA as a result. In 73 of 100 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LEA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Aroon Indicator for LEA entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 43 of 63 cases where LEA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for LEA just turned positive on October 14, 2026. Looking at past instances where LEA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +0.95% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LEA advanced for three days, in 210 of 322 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 7 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 41 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.122) is normal, around the industry mean (0.880). P/E Ratio (10.865) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.798). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.358) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.026) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.271) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. LEA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 67 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LEA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MPAA turned positive on September 23, 2026. Looking at past instances where MPAA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 37 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for MPAA's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +1.43% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MPAA advanced for three days, in 204 of 266 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
MPAA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MPAA as a result. In 67 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The 50-day moving average for MPAA moved below the 200-day moving average on September 29, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MPAA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
The Aroon Indicator for MPAA entered a downward trend on October 09, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 5 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.738) is normal, around the industry mean (0.880). P/E Ratio (-42.870) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.798). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.020) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.273) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MPAA’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MPAA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
LEA | MPAA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 7 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MPAA's Valuation (5) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEA (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MPAA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEA’s over the last 12 months.
MPAA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as LEA (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MPAA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
LEA's SMR Rating (67) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MPAA (91) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to MPAA’s over the last 12 months.
LEA's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MPAA (74) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to MPAA’s over the last 12 months.
LEA's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MPAA (97) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to MPAA’s over the last 12 months.
| LEA | MPAA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 65% | 17 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 81% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MPAA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPAA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while MPAA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -5.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.64%.
LEA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
MPAA is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPAA has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPAA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPAA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPAA | 100% | -3.52% | ||
| LEA - MPAA | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| SRI - MPAA | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| MGA - MPAA | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.86% | ||
| ALV - MPAA | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
| VC - MPAA | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.36% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WRND | 42.53 | 0.44 | +1.04% |
| NYLIM Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) | |||
| VEGN | 76.37 | 0.73 | +0.96% |
| US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) | |||
| NUKZ | 58.21 | 0.49 | +0.85% |
| Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) | |||
| SPLV | 74.54 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) | |||
| FNGD | 25.52 | -0.53 | -2.03% |
| MicroSectors FANG+ Index - 3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) | |||