LEA
Price
$120.89
Change
-$0.48 (-0.40%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.93B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SYPR
Price
$1.80
Change
+$0.05 (+2.86%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
39.14M
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEA vs SYPR

LEA vs SYPR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEA vs. SYPR commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEA is a Hold and SYPR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEA vs SYPR: Fundamental Ratings
LEA
SYPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6383
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5577
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
654
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for SYPR (94). This means that LEA’s stock grew significantly faster than SYPR’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as SYPR (100). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to SYPR’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's SMR Rating (67) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as SYPR (98). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to SYPR’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as SYPR (77). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to SYPR’s over the last 12 months.

SYPR's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEA (65). This means that SYPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEASYPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (LEA: $121.37 vs. SYPR: $1.75)
Brand notoriety: LEA and SYPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEA: 84% vs. SYPR: 3%
Market capitalization -- LEA: $5.93B vs. SYPR: $39.14M
LEA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $5.93B. SYPR’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $39.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $1.93K to $69.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $4.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SYPR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SYPR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the long-term than SYPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYPR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LEA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SYPR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SYPR is a better buy in the short-term than LEA.

Price Growth

LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +2.64% price change this week, while SYPR (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEA is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

SYPR is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.38% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

View a ticker or compare two or three
LEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SYPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRHQ46.770.27
+0.58%
SRH U.S. Quality GARP ETF (SRHQ)
ITA208.040.86
+0.42%
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA)
DDTM20.600.06
+0.30%
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March (DDTM)
TSYY19.540.02
+0.09%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY)
PMAR48.91-0.05
-0.10%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR)

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
+2.83%
ADNT - LEA
69%
Closely correlated
+4.33%
MGA - LEA
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
DCH - LEA
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.02%
BWA - LEA
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
SMP - LEA
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
More

SYPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SYPR and FRSX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SYPR and FRSX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SYPR
1D Price
Change %
SYPR100%
-1.13%
FRSX - SYPR
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
LEA - SYPR
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.83%
DAN - SYPR
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
SLDP - SYPR
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
QS - SYPR
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More