LFUS
Price
$260.51
Change
+$1.53 (+0.59%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.46B
28 days until earnings call
LINK
Price
$11.87
Change
-$0.69 (-5.49%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
117.09M
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFUS vs LINK

Header iconLFUS vs LINK Comparison
Open Charts LFUS vs LINKBanner chart's image
Littelfuse
Price$260.51
Change+$1.53 (+0.59%)
Volume$125.77K
Capitalization6.46B
Interlink Electronics
Price$11.87
Change-$0.69 (-5.49%)
Volume$215.65K
Capitalization117.09M
LFUS vs LINK Comparison Chart in %
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFUS vs. LINK commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFUS is a Hold and LINK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LFUS: $260.51 vs. LINK: $11.87)
Brand notoriety: LFUS and LINK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFUS: 83% vs. LINK: 172%
Market capitalization -- LFUS: $6.46B vs. LINK: $117.09M
LFUS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $6.46B. LINK’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $117.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $150.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFUS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLINK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LFUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LINK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFUS is a better buy in the long-term than LINK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LINK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFUS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LINK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LINK is a better buy in the short-term than LFUS.

Price Growth

LFUS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +1.05% price change this week, while LINK (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

LINK is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+3.69% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFUS($6.46B) has a higher market cap than LINK($117M). LINK has higher P/E ratio than LFUS: LINK (71.39) vs LFUS (60.58). LINK YTD gains are higher at: 90.377 vs. LFUS (11.560). LFUS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 342M vs. LINK (-881K). LFUS has more cash in the bank: 685M vs. LINK (2.33M). LINK has less debt than LFUS: LINK (994K) vs LFUS (897M). LFUS has higher revenues than LINK: LFUS (2.27B) vs LINK (11.7M).
LFUSLINKLFUS / LINK
Capitalization6.46B117M5,518%
EBITDA342M-881K-38,820%
Gain YTD11.56090.37713%
P/E Ratio60.5871.3985%
Revenue2.27B11.7M19,359%
Total Cash685M2.33M29,412%
Total Debt897M994K90,241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFUS vs LINK: Fundamental Ratings
LFUS
LINK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6343
SMR RATING
1..100
8795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFUS's Valuation (22) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LINK (84) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LINK’s over the last 12 months.

LINK's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as LFUS (63) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that LINK’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's SMR Rating (87) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as LINK (95) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to LINK’s over the last 12 months.

LINK's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as LFUS (45) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that LINK’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as LINK (15) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to LINK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFUSLINK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIRYY14.25N/A
N/A
Air China, Ltd.
CHFFF0.67N/A
N/A
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
CUSI18.05N/A
N/A
Cuisine Solutions, Inc.
MLGCF0.16N/A
N/A
M3 Metals Corp.
SKYZF0.58N/A
N/A
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd.