The 10-day moving average for LFUS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LFUS as a result. In 53 of 80 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for LFUS turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 60%.
LFUS moved below its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LFUS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
LFUS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for LFUS entered a downward trend on September 24, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for LFUS's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +7.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LFUS advanced for three days, in 192 of 294 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. LFUS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 70, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 67 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.695) is normal, around the industry mean (5.615). LFUS's P/E Ratio (-865.659) is considerably lower than the industry average of (81.453). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.987) is also within normal values, averaging (1.658). Dividend Yield (0.008) settles around the average of (0.005) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.805) is also within normal values, averaging (4.796).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
MEI moved below its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 32 of 36 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MEI as a result. In 65 of 82 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for MEI turned negative on October 16, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 41 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 32 of the 41 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 78%.
The 10-day moving average for MEI crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 14, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MEI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +2.91% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MEI advanced for three days, in 223 of 316 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
MEI may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 31 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.717) is normal, around the industry mean (5.615). P/E Ratio (-12.817) is within average values for comparable stocks, (81.453). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.210) is also within normal values, averaging (1.658). Dividend Yield (0.015) settles around the average of (0.005) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.451) is also within normal values, averaging (4.796).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MEI’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 53 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 65 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MEI’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 70, placing this stock worse than average.
LFUS | MEI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MEI's Valuation (31) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (67) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that MEI’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEI (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEI’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's SMR Rating (91) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as MEI (92) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to MEI’s over the last 12 months.
MEI's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (47) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that MEI’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEI (53) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEI’s over the last 12 months.
| LFUS | MEI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 65% | 10 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LFUS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MEI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LFUS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -10.69% price change this week, while MEI (@Electronic Components) price change was -14.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -12.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.68%.
LFUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
MEI is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFUS | 100% | -2.79% | ||
| BHE - LFUS | 74% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| PLXS - LFUS | 71% Closely correlated | -3.45% | ||
| TTMI - LFUS | 66% Closely correlated | -7.38% | ||
| FLEX - LFUS | 64% Loosely correlated | -8.16% | ||
| ROG - LFUS | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEI has been loosely correlated with LFUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEI jumps, then LFUS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MEI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEI | 100% | -6.85% | ||
| LFUS - MEI | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| BHE - MEI | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| CTS - MEI | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| GLW - MEI | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.64% | ||
| OUST - MEI | 39% Loosely correlated | -9.26% | ||
More | ||||