Advertisement
LFUS vs MEI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Littelfuse (LFUS) vs. Methode Electronics (MEI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LFUS operates as a larger, diversified industrial technology company with stronger recent price stability compared to the smaller MEI.
- Both companies serve the electronic components sector, exposing them to similar macroeconomic and supply-chain influences in recent market activity.
- LFUS benefits from broader product segments including circuit protection and power control, while MEI focuses on custom-engineered mechatronic solutions with higher relative volatility.
- Market capitalization differences highlight LFUS’s mid-cap scale versus MEI’s small-cap profile, affecting liquidity and risk profiles.
- Recent performance shows LFUS maintaining more consistent positioning amid sector pressures, whereas MEI has experienced sharper swings tied to earnings and demand signals.
- Sector exposure to electronics and automotive applications creates shared growth drivers but differing sensitivities to EV adoption and industrial spending trends.
Introduction
Investors and traders seeking to evaluate relative opportunities within the electronic components industry often compare stocks with overlapping yet distinct business profiles. LFUS and MEI both operate in this space, making their comparison relevant for those assessing sector exposure, size differentials, and performance dynamics. This analysis appeals particularly to market participants focused on industrial technology names, momentum evaluation, and portfolio diversification across mid- and small-cap equities in the current environment.
LFUS Overview and Recent Performance
Littelfuse, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells electronic components, modules, and subassemblies across segments including circuit protection, power control, and sensing solutions. The company serves markets tied to sustainability, connectivity, and safety themes. In recent market activity, LFUS has demonstrated relatively stable price behavior amid broader sector fluctuations, supported by its diversified operations and established market presence. Key influences on sentiment include ongoing product innovations and steady demand from industrial and automotive end markets, contributing to measured performance over recent weeks without extreme volatility.
MEI Overview and Recent Performance
Methode Electronics, Inc. designs, engineers, produces, and sells mechatronic products, including custom-engineered solutions for user interface, lighting, and power distribution applications. The company maintains operations across multiple regions and targets automotive and industrial customers. In recent market activity, MEI has shown more pronounced price movements influenced by earnings reports and shifts in demand visibility. Factors affecting performance include its smaller operational scale and sensitivity to specific end-market cycles, resulting in comparatively higher volatility during the recent period.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from a platform offering hundreds of such bots that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the highest-performing and most suitable options for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this trending section. Available bots exhibit a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker coverage, with many demonstrating historical win rates between 60% and 80% or annualized returns spanning various ranges depending on configuration. This diversity allows users to explore automated approaches aligned with individual objectives. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and strategy insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
LFUS maintains a larger market capitalization and broader business model spanning multiple electronic component categories, providing greater diversification relative to MEI’s more specialized focus on mechatronic and custom solutions. Growth drivers for both include electronics demand and automotive electrification, yet LFUS benefits from wider end-market reach while MEI faces potentially sharper impacts from targeted segment fluctuations. Recent momentum has favored LFUS with steadier positioning, contrasting MEI’s higher volatility linked to earnings variability. Risk factors differ by scale, with LFUS offering potentially lower liquidity risk and MEI presenting elevated sensitivity to operational or demand shifts. Sector exposure remains aligned in electronics, though market sentiment reflects the size differential in relative stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, operational scale, and relative positioning within the sector, Tickeron’s AI currently assigns a probabilistic preference toward LFUS for its demonstrated stability and diversified exposure in recent market conditions. MEI may appeal in scenarios seeking higher-beta opportunities tied to specific catalysts, though its smaller size introduces greater variability. This assessment draws from pattern recognition across performance metrics and remains subject to evolving data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFUS is a Hold and MEI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LFUS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMEI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LFUS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MEI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LFUS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MEI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LFUS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +2.56% price change this week, while MEI (@Electronic Components) price change was +15.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
LFUS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
MEI is expected to report earnings on Jun 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-1.97% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| LFUS | MEI | LFUS / MEI | |
| Capitalization | 12.4B | 494M | 2,510% |
| EBITDA | 210M | 29.2M | 719% |
| Gain YTD | 94.124 | 112.872 | 83% |
| P/E Ratio | 62.35 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.49B | 978M | 254% |
| Total Cash | 482M | 134M | 360% |
| Total Debt | 712M | 364M | 196% |
LFUS | MEI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MEI's Valuation (23) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (63) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that MEI’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MEI (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew significantly faster than MEI’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's SMR Rating (92) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as MEI (95) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to MEI’s over the last 12 months.
MEI's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (37) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that MEI’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEI (63) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEI’s over the last 12 months.
| LFUS | MEI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 65% | 14 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
LFUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFUS | 100% | +1.93% | ||
| KN - LFUS | 69% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| BHE - LFUS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| PLXS - LFUS | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| CTS - LFUS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| TTMI - LFUS | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
More | ||||
MEI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEI has been loosely correlated with LFUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEI jumps, then LFUS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MEI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEI | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| LFUS - MEI | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| CTS - MEI | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| DAKT - MEI | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| KN - MEI | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| BHE - MEI | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
More | ||||