Advertisement
LFWD vs PROF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFWD is a Hold and PROF is a Hold.
| LFWD | PROF | LFWD / PROF | |
| Capitalization | 20.2M | 222M | 9% |
| EBITDA | -21.19M | -34.88M | 61% |
| Gain YTD | 4.058 | -24.142 | -17% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 21.8M | 19.1M | 114% |
| Total Cash | 9.45M | 38.3M | 25% |
| Total Debt | 6.99M | 7.38M | 95% |
LFWD | PROF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LFWD's Valuation (26) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as PROF (34) in the null industry. This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to PROF’s over the last 12 months.
LFWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as PROF (100) in the null industry. This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to PROF’s over the last 12 months.
PROF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as LFWD (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that PROF’s stock grew similarly to LFWD’s over the last 12 months.
LFWD's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as PROF (56) in the null industry. This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to PROF’s over the last 12 months.
LFWD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as PROF (100) in the null industry. This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to PROF’s over the last 12 months.
| LFWD | PROF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 72% | 18 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 68% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LFWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PROF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LFWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFWD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PROF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LFWD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PROF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LFWD (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while PROF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -13.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
LFWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.
PROF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.01% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
LFWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LFWD and PROF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFWD and PROF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFWD | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| PROF - LFWD | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| MBOT - LFWD | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| ALGN - LFWD | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| SENS - LFWD | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| UFPT - LFWD | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
PROF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PROF has been loosely correlated with OWLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PROF jumps, then OWLT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PROF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROF | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| OWLT - PROF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LFWD - PROF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
| MTD - PROF | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| BVS - PROF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
| A - PROF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||