Advertisement
LFWD vs SENS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFWD is a Hold and SENS is a Hold.
| LFWD | SENS | LFWD / SENS | |
| Capitalization | 20.2M | 460M | 4% |
| EBITDA | -21.19M | -102.37M | 21% |
| Gain YTD | 4.058 | 57.790 | 7% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 21.8M | 48.5M | 45% |
| Total Cash | 9.45M | 143M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 6.99M | 61.8M | 11% |
LFWD | SENS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LFWD's Valuation (26) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (53) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.
LFWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's SMR Rating (99) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFWD (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew similarly to LFWD’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFWD (55) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew similarly to LFWD’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for LFWD (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew significantly faster than LFWD’s over the last 12 months.
| LFWD | SENS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LFWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SENS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LFWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SENS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFWD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LFWD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SENS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LFWD (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while SENS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -9.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
LFWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.
SENS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.01% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
LFWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LFWD and PROF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFWD and PROF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFWD | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| PROF - LFWD | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| MBOT - LFWD | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| ALGN - LFWD | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| SENS - LFWD | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| UFPT - LFWD | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
SENS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SENS has been loosely correlated with QSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SENS jumps, then QSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SENS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENS | 100% | -0.91% | ||
| QSI - SENS | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| RCEL - SENS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| CERS - SENS | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| VIVO - SENS | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| FEED - SENS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||