Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLV vs RECS
LGLV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LGLV vs RECS
LGLV vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLV vs. RECS commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLV is a Buy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.73B vs. LGLV (1.13B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LGLV: RECS (5.950) vs LGLV (3.910). LGLV was incepted earlier than RECS: LGLV (13 years) vs RECS (7 years). LGLV (0.12) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover LGLV (16.00) vs LGLV (16.00).
| LGLV | RECS | LGLV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 3.910 | 5.950 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 5.73B | 20% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 0.15 | 80% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 32.00 | 50% |
| Yield | 2.03 | 0.74 | 275% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LGLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LGLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGLV has been closely correlated with AFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGLV jumps, then AFL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGLV | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| AFL - LGLV | 77% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| APD - LGLV | 72% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| GL - LGLV | 68% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| MMM - LGLV | 68% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| PLD - LGLV | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
More | ||||