LI
Price
$13.21
Change
-$0.37 (-2.72%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
13.33B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NIO
Price
$5.02
Change
-$0.03 (-0.59%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
13.05B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LI vs NIO

LI vs NIO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LI vs. NIO commentary
Jun 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LI is a Hold and NIO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 20, 2026
Stock price -- (LI: $13.21 vs. NIO: $5.02)
Brand notoriety: LI: Not notable vs. NIO: Notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LI: 77% vs. NIO: 92%
Market capitalization -- LI: $13.33B vs. NIO: $13.05B
LI [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $13.33B. NIO’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $13.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.5T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $65.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNIO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LI is a better buy in the long-term than NIO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NIO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIO is a better buy in the short-term than LI.

Price Growth

LI (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while NIO (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -4.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

LI is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

NIO is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-2.38% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LI($13.3B) and NIO($13.1B) have the same market capitalization . NIO YTD gains are higher at: -1.569 vs. LI (-21.973). LI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.92B vs. NIO (-7.54B). LI has more cash in the bank: 93.1B vs. NIO (31.8B). LI has less debt than NIO: LI (17.7B) vs NIO (26.6B). LI has higher revenues than NIO: LI (109B) vs NIO (101B).
LINIOLI / NIO
Capitalization13.3B13.1B102%
EBITDA-1.92B-7.54B25%
Gain YTD-21.973-1.5691,401%
P/E Ratio99.38N/A-
Revenue109B101B108%
Total Cash93.1B31.8B293%
Total Debt17.7B26.6B67%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LI vs NIO: Fundamental Ratings
LI
NIO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
471
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIO's Valuation (73) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as LI (76) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to LI’s over the last 12 months.

NIO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as LI (100) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to LI’s over the last 12 months.

LI's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as NIO (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that LI’s stock grew similarly to NIO’s over the last 12 months.

NIO's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as LI (83) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to LI’s over the last 12 months.

LI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NIO (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that LI’s stock grew significantly faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINIO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NIO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGL1.760.04
+2.33%
Founder Group Limited
FBNC60.760.47
+0.78%
First Bancorp
CRGO1.50N/A
N/A
Freightos Limited
OHI44.53-0.11
-0.25%
Omega Healthcare Investors
PANL7.38-0.08
-1.07%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd