LIND
Price
$12.48
Change
+$0.07 (+0.56%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
679.93M
25 days until earnings call
WW
Price
$26.46
Change
+$0.32 (+1.22%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
264.25M
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIND vs WW

Header iconLIND vs WW Comparison
Open Charts LIND vs WWBanner chart's image
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$12.48
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
Volume$197.82K
Capitalization679.93M
WW International
Price$26.46
Change+$0.32 (+1.22%)
Volume$231.03K
Capitalization264.25M
LIND vs WW Comparison Chart in %
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIND vs. WW commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Hold and WW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LIND: $12.48 vs. WW: $26.46)
Brand notoriety: LIND: Not notable vs. WW: Notable
LIND represents the Consumer Sundries, while WW is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIND: 49% vs. WW: 80%
Market capitalization -- LIND: $679.93M vs. WW: $264.25M
LIND [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $679.93M. WW’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $264.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $175.6B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $17.58B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WW is a better buy in the long-term than LIND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while WW (@Personnel Services) price change was -4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.11%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +219.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

WW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-0.07% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-0.02% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIND($680M) has a higher market cap than WW($264M). WW YTD gains are higher at: 1983.465 vs. LIND (5.228). WW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. LIND (96.1M). LIND has more cash in the bank: 201M vs. WW (152M). WW has less debt than LIND: WW (477M) vs LIND (628M). WW has higher revenues than LIND: WW (741M) vs LIND (702M).
LINDWWLIND / WW
Capitalization680M264M258%
EBITDA96.1M1.15B8%
Gain YTD5.2281983.4650%
P/E RatioN/A1.93-
Revenue702M741M95%
Total Cash201M152M132%
Total Debt628M477M132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND vs WW: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
WW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6962
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
10011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5034
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9878
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WW's Valuation (86) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as LIND (88). This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

LIND's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as WW (100). This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to WW’s over the last 12 months.

WW's SMR Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100). This means that WW’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as LIND (50). This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

WW's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as LIND (98). This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTRN40.250.92
+2.34%
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
AIYY2.750.06
+2.23%
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF
GAM62.840.58
+0.94%
General American Investors Company
JMSI50.140.01
+0.02%
JPMorgan Sustainable Municipal Inc ETF
CTBB20.11-0.16
-0.79%
Qwest Corp

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
+0.56%
CCL - LIND
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
CUK - LIND
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
NCLH - LIND
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
RCL - LIND
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
VIK - LIND
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More