97 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LITP vs SGML
LITP vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SGML
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.10
Change-$0.03 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.83M
Sigma Lithium
Price$11.15
Change-$0.23 (-2.02%)
Volume$590
Capitalization1.54B
LITP vs SGML Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SGML commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SGML is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 87% | 16 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 85% | 22 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -2.46% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -3.44% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -4.04% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -6.49% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| PLL - SGML | 49% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
| PILBF - SGML | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.45% | ||
| GLNCY - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| BHP - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
More | ||||