66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LITP vs SGML
LITP vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SGML
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$6.48
Change-$0.17 (-2.56%)
Volume$2.63K
Net Assets6.08M
Sigma Lithium
Price$11.63
Change-$0.10 (-0.85%)
Volume$407.39K
Capitalization1.54B
LITP vs SGML Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SGML commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SGML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -2.56% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| LAR - SGML | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| PLL - SGML | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| PILBF - SGML | 45% Loosely correlated | -5.47% | ||
| BHP - SGML | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||