20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SGML
LITP vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SGML
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$6.96
Change+$0.16 (+2.35%)
Volume$53.93K
Net Assets17.54M
Sigma Lithium
Price$5.20
Change+$0.21 (+4.21%)
Volume$4.02M
Capitalization1.54B
LITP vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SGML commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SGML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 17 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +2.43% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +6.62% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +4.10% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +4.21% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 63% Loosely correlated | +6.64% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | +4.21% | ||
| LAR - SGML | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.64% | ||
| FCX - SGML | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| SCCO - SGML | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| BHP - SGML | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
More | ||||