One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LITP vs SGML
LITP vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SGML
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.24K
CapitalizationN/A
Sigma Lithium
Price$13.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$740.38K
CapitalizationN/A
LITP vs SGML Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SGML commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SGML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -6.96% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +6.63% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with PLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then PLL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| PLL - SGML | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.63% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
| PILBF - SGML | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.65% | ||
| GLNCY - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.78% | ||
| MP - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.74% | ||
More | ||||