Advertisement
LIVN vs NPCE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIVN is a Hold and NPCE is a Hold.
| LIVN | NPCE | LIVN / NPCE | |
| Capitalization | 4.31B | 482M | 894% |
| EBITDA | 206M | -7.82M | -2,636% |
| Gain YTD | 27.060 | -9.067 | -298% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.06 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.47B | 107M | 1,376% |
| Total Cash | 517M | 51.7M | 1,000% |
| Total Debt | 352M | 69.9M | 504% |
LIVN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LIVN | NPCE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIVN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while NPCE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LIVN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NPCE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIVN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPCE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIVN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NPCE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LIVN (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -4.57% price change this week, while NPCE (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -5.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
LIVN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
NPCE is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.01% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
LIVN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIVN has been loosely correlated with CRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIVN jumps, then CRL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIVN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIVN | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRL - LIVN | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| ENOV - LIVN | 44% Loosely correlated | +4.73% | ||
| NVST - LIVN | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| A - LIVN | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| MTD - LIVN | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
More | ||||
NPCE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPCE has been loosely correlated with ESTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPCE jumps, then ESTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPCE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPCE | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| ESTA - NPCE | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| CBLL - NPCE | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| STVN - NPCE | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| LIVN - NPCE | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| UFPT - NPCE | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||