LKFN
Price
$58.41
Change
-$1.70 (-2.83%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.5B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBI
Price
$14.28
Change
-$0.41 (-2.79%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
139.17M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKFN vs RMBI

Header iconLKFN vs RMBI Comparison
Open Charts LKFN vs RMBIBanner chart's image
LKFN vs RMBI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKFN vs. RMBI commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKFN is a StrongBuy and RMBI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (LKFN: $60.15 vs. RMBI: $14.71)
Brand notoriety: LKFN and RMBI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKFN: 81% vs. RMBI: 95%
Market capitalization -- LKFN: $1.5B vs. RMBI: $139.17M
LKFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.5B. RMBI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $139.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKFN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LKFN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMBI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LKFN and RMBI are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKFN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBI’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKFN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RMBI’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMBI is a better buy in the short-term than LKFN.

Price Growth

LKFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.92% price change this week, while RMBI (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

LKFN is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.84% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKFN($1.5B) has a higher market cap than RMBI($139M). LKFN has higher P/E ratio than RMBI: LKFN (14.09) vs RMBI (11.77). LKFN YTD gains are higher at: 7.253 vs. RMBI (5.902). LKFN has more cash in the bank: 57.1M vs. RMBI (11.4M). LKFN has less debt than RMBI: LKFN (68.2M) vs RMBI (254M). LKFN has higher revenues than RMBI: LKFN (275M) vs RMBI (46.7M).
LKFNRMBILKFN / RMBI
Capitalization1.5B139M1,078%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.2535.902123%
P/E Ratio14.0911.77120%
Revenue275M46.7M589%
Total Cash57.1M11.4M501%
Total Debt68.2M254M27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKFN vs RMBI: Fundamental Ratings
LKFN
RMBI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7181
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9373
SMR RATING
1..100
4477
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMBI's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKFN (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RMBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

RMBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as LKFN (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RMBI’s stock grew similarly to LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

LKFN's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBI (77) in the null industry. This means that LKFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBI’s over the last 12 months.

LKFN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RMBI (58) in the null industry. This means that LKFN’s stock grew similarly to RMBI’s over the last 12 months.

LKFN's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RMBI (71) in the null industry. This means that LKFN’s stock grew similarly to RMBI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKFNRMBI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCMSX54.22N/A
N/A
Voya Small Cap Growth I
SMSAX10.63N/A
N/A
SEI Multi Strategy Alternatives F (SIMT)
PCGRX27.12N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Mid Cap Value A
GMNAX13.45N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Mini Mites A
OAKLX91.09-1.07
-1.16%
Oakmark Select Investor

LKFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKFN has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LKFN jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFN
1D Price
Change %
LKFN100%
+1.57%
SRCE - LKFN
82%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
PEBO - LKFN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
BY - LKFN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
MBWM - LKFN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
BUSE - LKFN
80%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
More

RMBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBI has been loosely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBI jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBI
1D Price
Change %
RMBI100%
+3.37%
MCBS - RMBI
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
SYBT - RMBI
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
LKFN - RMBI
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
ATLO - RMBI
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
AUB - RMBI
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
More