It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LLY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LLY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
LLY (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +2.15% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.94%.
LLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
LLY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 20 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LLY | THW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 9 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LLY has been loosely correlated with AZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LLY jumps, then AZN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that THW and ELV have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THW and ELV's prices will move in lockstep.