Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMECX vs WFCPX
LMECX vs WFCPX Comparison
Open Charts LMECX vs WFCPX
LMECX vs WFCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFCPX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. LMECX (622M). WFCPX pays higher dividends than LMECX: WFCPX (5.26) vs LMECX (4.89). LMECX was incepted earlier than WFCPX: LMECX (19 years) vs WFCPX (5 years). LMECX (0.04) and WFCPX (0.04) have similar cost to investors . WFCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 315.00 vs. LMECX (299.00). LMECX (0) and WFCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.20 vs. WFCPX (5.46). WFCPX return over 5 years is better than : 5.67 vs. LMECX (-18.26).
| LMECX | WFCPX | LMECX / WFCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.926 | 1.030 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 622M | 1.17B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 5.26 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 5.46 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.65 | 17.37 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.26 | 5.67 | -322% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement