Advertisement
LPL vs TBCH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPL is a Hold and TBCH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LPL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTBCH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LPL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- TBCH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBCH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TBCH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LPL (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -6.13% price change this week, while TBCH (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +3.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -8.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -21.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -34.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
LPL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
TBCH is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (-8.72% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| LPL | TBCH | LPL / TBCH | |
| Capitalization | 4.22B | 268M | 1,576% |
| EBITDA | 5.66T | 23.6M | 23,970,339% |
| Gain YTD | 5.463 | -3.706 | -147% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.71 | 675.50 | 5% |
| Revenue | 26.44T | 298M | 8,873,154% |
| Total Cash | 1.56T | 12.3M | 12,699,187% |
| Total Debt | 13.55T | 52.8M | 25,659,091% |
LPL | TBCH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LPL's Valuation (4) in the Electronics Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for TBCH (93) in the null industry. This means that LPL’s stock grew significantly faster than TBCH’s over the last 12 months.
LPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as TBCH (100) in the null industry. This means that LPL’s stock grew similarly to TBCH’s over the last 12 months.
LPL's SMR Rating (20) in the Electronics Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for TBCH (91) in the null industry. This means that LPL’s stock grew significantly faster than TBCH’s over the last 12 months.
TBCH's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LPL (45) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that TBCH’s stock grew similarly to LPL’s over the last 12 months.
TBCH's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as LPL (14) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that TBCH’s stock grew similarly to LPL’s over the last 12 months.
| LPL | TBCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 63% | 13 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 8 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
LPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LPL and AAPL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LPL and AAPL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPL | 100% | -4.31% | ||
| AAPL - LPL | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SONY - LPL | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.03% | ||
| SONO - LPL | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.49% | ||
| WTO - LPL | 9% Poorly correlated | +10.98% | ||
| TBCH - LPL | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
More | ||||
TBCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBCH has been loosely correlated with SONO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBCH jumps, then SONO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TBCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBCH | 100% | -1.89% | ||
| SONO - TBCH | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| KOSS - TBCH | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| VUZI - TBCH | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.38% | ||
| LPL - TBCH | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.31% | ||
| SONY - TBCH | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.03% | ||
More | ||||