Advertisement
LPX vs MAS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) vs. Masco Corporation (MAS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LPX boasts a year-to-date gain of 8.41%, outperforming MAS's 5.52% in the same period, reflecting stronger momentum earlier in the year.
- MAS trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 17.27 versus LPX's 35.43, suggesting better relative value.
- Both stocks operate in the cyclical building products sector, with recent performance influenced by housing market trends and inventory dynamics.
- LPX has a smaller market cap of $5.15 billion compared to MAS's $13.58 billion, implying higher growth potential but greater volatility for LPX.
- Upcoming earnings for MAS could serve as a near-term catalyst amid broader sector pressures.
Introduction
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) and Masco Corporation (MAS) are key players in the building products industry, supplying materials essential for residential construction, remodeling, and home improvement. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors and traders tracking the housing market cycle, where demand fluctuations impact performance. Both companies face similar macroeconomic influences like interest rates and inventory levels, but differ in product focus and scale. Analyzing their recent relative performance, valuations, and market positioning helps inform decisions in a volatile sector environment.
LPX Overview and Recent Performance
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) manufactures engineered wood building solutions, including siding products under LP SmartSide and oriented strand board (OSB; structural panels used in walls and roofs) through its two main segments. The company serves new home construction, repair, remodeling, and outdoor markets primarily in North America. In recent weeks, LPX shares have exhibited volatility, declining around 13% since the last earnings report amid broader market dips and sector headwinds. Sentiment has been mixed, with investor attention drawn to valuation rebounds and growth outlook despite inventory adjustments and housing slowdown signals. The stock trades near its 52-week low of $69.34, down from a high of $102.86.
MAS Overview and Recent Performance
Masco Corporation (MAS) designs and distributes home improvement products, spanning plumbing fixtures (faucets, showers under brands like Delta) and decorative architectural items (paints via Behr, hardware). Its operations cover North America, Europe, and beyond, targeting retailers, wholesalers, and contractors. Recent market activity has seen MAS maintain steadier footing, with shares positioned between its 52-week range of $56.55 to $79.19. Performance reflects resilience amid housing pressures, bolstered by expectations for modest revenue growth in upcoming quarterly results. Investor focus remains on sales trends and margin impacts from market conditions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots out of 351 available, curated for current market conditions based on real-time performance across thousands of tickers. These virtual agents deliver trading signals with built-in risk management, featuring annualized returns ranging from +15.50% to +167.82%, win rates of 53.91% to 87.72%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Bots employ diverse strategies like 15-minute scalping, swing trading, trend following, and sector-specific plays (e.g., semiconductors, industrials, ETFs), with timeframes from hours to months. Traders can copy these bots to automate strategies suited to volatile environments. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your risk tolerance and timeframe.
Head-to-Head Comparison
LPX and MAS both thrive on housing demand but diverge in business models: LPX emphasizes structural components like OSB and siding for new builds, while MAS offers consumer-facing plumbing and finishes for remodeling. Growth drivers include construction activity for LPX and renovation spending for MAS, exposing both to interest rate sensitivity. Recent momentum favors LPX on YTD returns but lags in stability, with MAS showing lower volatility. Risk factors encompass cyclical downturns and commodity costs; LPX faces higher beta due to smaller scale, while MAS benefits from brand diversification. Market sentiment tilts toward value in MAS amid recent LPX dips.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward MAS for its lower P/E valuation, larger market capitalization offering stability, and potential earnings catalyst positioning it favorably in the sector. LPX shows trend strength year-to-date but faces nearer-term volatility risks. This probabilistic edge reflects relative momentum and risk-reward balance in prevailing housing market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPX is a StrongBuy and MAS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LPX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LPX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LPX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LPX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- MAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LPX (@Building Products) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while MAS (@Building Products) price change was -1.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
LPX is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
MAS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (-0.12% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| LPX | MAS | LPX / MAS | |
| Capitalization | 5.29B | 14.8B | 36% |
| EBITDA | 278M | 1.27B | 22% |
| Gain YTD | -5.474 | 17.001 | -32% |
| P/E Ratio | 64.74 | 18.21 | 355% |
| Revenue | 2.56B | 7.68B | 33% |
| Total Cash | 164M | 388M | 42% |
| Total Debt | 378M | 3.3B | 11% |
LPX | MAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 17 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LPX's Valuation (65) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as MAS (94) in the Building Products industry. This means that LPX’s stock grew similarly to MAS’s over the last 12 months.
MAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as LPX (80) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to LPX’s over the last 12 months.
MAS's SMR Rating (2) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for LPX (87) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew significantly faster than LPX’s over the last 12 months.
MAS's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as LPX (49) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to LPX’s over the last 12 months.
LPX's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAS (46) in the Building Products industry. This means that LPX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAS’s over the last 12 months.
| LPX | MAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| USMV | 94.28 | 0.04 | +0.04% |
| iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | |||
| EQL | 50.27 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | |||
| RVNU | 25.18 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| Xtrackers Municipal Infras Rev Bd ETF | |||
| EZMO | 26.59 | -0.11 | -0.41% |
| AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF | |||
| MSFY | 16.20 | -0.51 | -3.06% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Microsoft ETF | |||
LPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPX has been closely correlated with BXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LPX jumps, then BXC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPX | 100% | -2.35% | ||
| BXC - LPX | 78% Closely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| BLDR - LPX | 73% Closely correlated | -4.05% | ||
| OC - LPX | 70% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| TREX - LPX | 69% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| MAS - LPX | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||
MAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAS has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAS jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAS | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| FBIN - MAS | 75% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| BLDR - MAS | 71% Closely correlated | -4.05% | ||
| OC - MAS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| BXC - MAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| IR - MAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
More | ||||