This stock comparison pits Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) against Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT), two key players in the semiconductor ecosystem benefiting from surging AI and data center demand. Investors and traders eyeing relative performance in this volatile sector will find value here, as both companies support critical wafer fabrication processes but differ in scale, momentum, and risk profiles. Amid recent market shifts like geopolitical tensions and earnings cycles, understanding their head-to-head dynamics aids in assessing market positioning and potential trade-offs.
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is a leading provider of semiconductor processing equipment used in integrated circuit fabrication, serving major foundries with products like etch, deposition, and clean systems. In recent market activity, LRCX shares traded around $251, reflecting a YTD gain of approximately 47% but facing pullbacks in recent weeks amid a broader semiconductor sell-off triggered by U.S.-China trade tensions and concerns over AI spending sustainability. The company's March quarter results exceeded expectations, with strong earnings guidance bolstering long-term sentiment despite short-term volatility. Analyst optimism persists, with an average price target near $306, driven by robust demand for advanced nodes in AI chips.
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT) specializes in critical subsystems, components, and cleaning services for semiconductor manufacturing, supporting integrated device makers and equipment producers with gas delivery, assemblies, and process optimization. Shares recently hovered at $78, showcasing explosive YTD returns over 200% and solid gains in recent weeks following a Q1 earnings beat, where EPS of $0.31 topped estimates and Q2 revenue guidance of $565-605 million signaled strength. Positive customer feedback on WFE spending has fueled momentum, though its smaller scale introduces higher volatility compared to peers.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers from its library of 351 AI trading bots, each employing diverse strategies like day trading (5-60 minute timeframes) and swing trading (up to 50-day holds) across thousands of tickers. These curated bots excel in current conditions, boasting annualized returns from 24% to 165%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Semiconductor-focused agents, including those trading LRCX, UCTT, and peers like AMAT and KLAC, have delivered standout results such as 99% returns with 64% win rates. Explore these tools to align automated strategies with market trends.
LRCX and UCTT both thrive on AI-fueled semiconductor growth but diverge in business models: LRCX focuses on high-end fabrication equipment with a $314 billion market cap and price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 47, offering stability, while UCTT's $3.5 billion cap and component-centric approach enable nimbler responses to demand spikes, albeit with elevated beta (1.81, a measure of volatility). Recent momentum favors UCTT with 38% monthly gains versus LRCX's more tempered path amid sector headwinds. Risk factors include geopolitical exposure for both, but LRCX benefits from diversified global revenue, trading off explosive upside for consistency.
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward UCTT based on superior recent trend consistency, post-earnings catalysts, and relative outperformance in AI infrastructure plays. While LRCX offers greater stability and scale, UCTT's momentum positions it probabilistically stronger in the near term amid bullish WFE outlooks.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LRCX’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileUCTT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LRCX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCTT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LRCX (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +5.38% price change this week, while UCTT (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +8.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +129.72%.
LRCX is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
UCTT is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| LRCX | UCTT | LRCX / UCTT | |
| Capitalization | 464B | 5.01B | 9,271% |
| EBITDA | 8.07B | -34.5M | -23,397% |
| Gain YTD | 139.701 | 385.748 | 36% |
| P/E Ratio | 77.42 | 39.89 | 194% |
| Revenue | 21.7B | 2.07B | 1,049% |
| Total Cash | 1.68B | 324M | 517% |
| Total Debt | 3.73B | 780M | 479% |
LRCX | UCTT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UCTT's Valuation (59) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LRCX (89). This means that UCTT’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as UCTT (29). This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's SMR Rating (17) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for UCTT (98). This means that LRCX’s stock grew significantly faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as UCTT (34). This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for UCTT (100). This means that LRCX’s stock grew significantly faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
| LRCX | UCTT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 64% | 23 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +5.27% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 86% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCTT has been closely correlated with ICHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCTT jumps, then ICHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCTT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCTT | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| ICHR - UCTT | 73% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| ONTO - UCTT | 72% Closely correlated | +4.23% | ||
| RMBS - UCTT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| LRCX - UCTT | 71% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| COHU - UCTT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||