Advertisement
LRND vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRND is a Buy and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 7 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LRND | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GCAL | 49.75 | N/A | +0.01% |
| Goldman Sachs Dynamic CA Muncpl Inc ETF | |||
| ULVM | 86.78 | N/A | N/A |
| VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | |||
| SCDL | 37.68 | N/A | N/A |
| ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Div Fctr TR ETN | |||
| PNOV | 40.42 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF Nov | |||
| BINC | 52.88 | -0.08 | -0.15% |
| iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | |||
LRND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRND has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRND jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRND | 100% | N/A | ||
| AMZN - LRND | 78% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| MSFT - LRND | 74% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| CDNS - LRND | 73% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| SNPS - LRND | 71% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| LRCX - LRND | 70% Closely correlated | -7.33% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| S - SNPS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||