Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSVVX vs RMEBX
LSVVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSVVX vs RMEBX
LSVVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSVVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSVVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LSVVX (165M). LSVVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LSVVX (1.67) vs RMEBX (1.04). LSVVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LSVVX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LSVVX (0.56). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LSVVX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSVVX: RMEBX (250) vs LSVVX (100000). LSVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.61 vs. RMEBX (9.16). RMEBX (33.79) and LSVVX (33.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LSVVX | RMEBX | LSVVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.07 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.07 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.844 | 6.885 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.04 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.61 | 9.16 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.75 | 33.97 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.08 | 33.79 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.19 | 92.81 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers