Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSVVX vs RMFCX
LSVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSVVX vs RMFCX
LSVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSVVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LSVVX (173M). LSVVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LSVVX (1.59) vs RMFCX (1.15). LSVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LSVVX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LSVVX (0.56). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LSVVX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSVVX: RMFCX (250) vs LSVVX (100000). LSVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.73 vs. RMFCX (9.09). LSVVX return over 5 years is better than : 41.18 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| LSVVX | RMFCX | LSVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.91 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.019 | 9.496 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.15 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.73 | 9.09 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.47 | 33.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.18 | 37.08 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.81 | 92.36 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement