Advertisement
LTC vs SELF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTC is a Hold and SELF is a Hold.
| LTC | SELF | LTC / SELF | |
| Capitalization | 2.34B | 57.8M | 4,054% |
| EBITDA | 225M | 4.6M | 4,896% |
| Gain YTD | 31.486 | 2.081 | 1,513% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.52 | 28.11 | 55% |
| Revenue | 348M | 12.8M | 2,719% |
| Total Cash | 40.4M | 7.51M | 538% |
| Total Debt | 780M | 15.5M | 5,032% |
LTC | SELF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LTC's Valuation (15) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SELF (17) in the null industry. This means that LTC’s stock grew similarly to SELF’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SELF (59) in the null industry. This means that LTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SELF’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's SMR Rating (64) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SELF (84) in the null industry. This means that LTC’s stock grew similarly to SELF’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SELF (57) in the null industry. This means that LTC’s stock grew similarly to SELF’s over the last 12 months.
SELF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTC (70) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SELF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTC’s over the last 12 months.
| LTC | SELF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 14 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 42% | 1 day ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 58% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while SELF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SELF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SELF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SELF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LTC (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +3.45% price change this week, while SELF (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -1.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
LTC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
SELF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-1.33% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
@Specialty Telecommunications (-2.70% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBHL | 24.94 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| iShares iBonds 2032 Term HY and Inc ETF | |||
| BIDD | 30.26 | -0.06 | -0.19% |
| iShares International Dividend ActiveETF | |||
| LUNL | 3.30 | -0.01 | -0.24% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LUNR ETF | |||
| NMT | 11.15 | -0.09 | -0.79% |
| Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| NMZ | 9.26 | -0.20 | -2.11% |
| Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund | |||
SELF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SELF and DBRG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SELF and DBRG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SELF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SELF | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| DBRG - SELF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| LAMR - SELF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
| AI - SELF | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
| BRT - SELF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| LTC - SELF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
More | ||||