3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LTL vs MTCH
LTL vs MTCH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTL vs. MTCH commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTL is a Buy and MTCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTCH: Fundamental Ratings
MTCH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MTCH | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GVIP | 124.35 | 2.92 | +2.41% |
| Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | |||
| MTUM | 216.38 | 4.86 | +2.30% |
| iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | |||
| IFV | 21.08 | 0.20 | +0.96% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Intl Foc 5 | |||
| BCIM | 20.36 | 0.19 | +0.94% |
| abrdn Blmb Indstl Mtls Stgy K1 Fr ETF | |||
| FLGV | 20.38 | -0.10 | -0.49% |
| Franklin U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | |||
LTL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTL has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LTL jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTL | 100% | +2.78% | ||
| GOOGL - LTL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| TKO - LTL | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| MTCH - LTL | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| PARA - LTL | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| GOOG - LTL | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
More | ||||
MTCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTCH has been loosely correlated with CARG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTCH jumps, then CARG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTCH | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| CARG - MTCH | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| SMWB - MTCH | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| YELP - MTCH | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| LTRPA - MTCH | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FVRR - MTCH | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
More | ||||