LULU
Price
$237.61
Change
+$2.59 (+1.10%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
48.54B
58 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$80.40
Change
+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.28B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LULU vs MET

Header iconLULU vs MET Comparison
Open Charts LULU vs METBanner chart's image
lululemon athletica
Price$237.61
Change+$2.59 (+1.10%)
Volume$34.29K
Capitalization48.54B
MetLife
Price$80.40
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Volume$45.96K
Capitalization53.28B
LULU vs MET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LULU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LULU vs. MET commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LULU is a StrongBuy and MET is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (LULU: $235.02 vs. MET: $80.37)
Brand notoriety: LULU and MET are both notable
LULU represents the Apparel/Footwear Retail, while MET is part of the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LULU: 216% vs. MET: 129%
Market capitalization -- LULU: $48.54B vs. MET: $53.28B
LULU [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $48.54B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $53.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $119.4B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $13.84B. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LULU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LULU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than LULU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LULU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LULU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the short-term than LULU.

Price Growth

LULU (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.82%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

LULU is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+0.60% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.86% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than LULU($48.5B). MET has higher P/E ratio than LULU: MET (40.71) vs LULU (31.57). MET YTD gains are higher at: -0.485 vs. LULU (-38.542). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. LULU (2.24B). LULU has less debt than MET: LULU (1.4B) vs MET (18.8B). MET has higher revenues than LULU: MET (66.4B) vs LULU (9.62B).
LULUMETLULU / MET
Capitalization48.5B53.3B91%
EBITDA2.59BN/A-
Gain YTD-38.542-0.4857,949%
P/E Ratio31.5740.7178%
Revenue9.62B66.4B14%
Total Cash2.24B308B1%
Total Debt1.4B18.8B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LULU vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
LULU
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
2299
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (45) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LULU (75) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to LULU’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LULU (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that MET’s stock grew significantly faster than LULU’s over the last 12 months.

LULU's SMR Rating (22) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for MET (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew significantly faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LULU (65) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to LULU’s over the last 12 months.

LULU's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as MET (93) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LULUMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LULU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YUM148.411.36
+0.92%
Yum! Brands
TPG53.090.27
+0.51%
TPG
NVGS14.53-0.18
-1.22%
NAVIGATOR HOLDINGS Ltd
TOPP1.63-0.07
-4.12%
Toppoint Holdings Inc
NOTV1.70-0.14
-7.61%
Inotiv

LULU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LULU has been loosely correlated with ZUMZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LULU jumps, then ZUMZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LULU
1D Price
Change %
LULU100%
+1.49%
ZUMZ - LULU
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
GCO - LULU
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
BKE - LULU
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
LE - LULU
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
AEO - LULU
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+0.51%
PRU - MET
91%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
AFL - MET
86%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
LNC - MET
81%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
PRI - MET
80%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
JXN - MET
76%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
More