It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LULU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LULU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LULU (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.36%.
LULU is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
MET is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
@Life/Health Insurance (+1.86% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
LULU | MET | LULU / MET | |
Capitalization | 48.5B | 53.3B | 91% |
EBITDA | 2.59B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -38.542 | -0.485 | 7,949% |
P/E Ratio | 31.57 | 40.71 | 78% |
Revenue | 9.62B | 66.4B | 14% |
Total Cash | 2.24B | 308B | 1% |
Total Debt | 1.4B | 18.8B | 7% |
LULU | MET | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MET's Valuation (45) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LULU (75) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to LULU’s over the last 12 months.
MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LULU (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that MET’s stock grew significantly faster than LULU’s over the last 12 months.
LULU's SMR Rating (22) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for MET (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew significantly faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.
MET's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LULU (65) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to LULU’s over the last 12 months.
LULU's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as MET (93) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.
LULU | MET | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago61% | 4 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago69% | 20 days ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago61% | 6 days ago64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LULU has been loosely correlated with ZUMZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LULU jumps, then ZUMZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LULU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LULU | 100% | +1.49% | ||
ZUMZ - LULU | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
GCO - LULU | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
BKE - LULU | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
LE - LULU | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
AEO - LULU | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.