Advertisement
LULU vs RENT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LULU is a Hold and RENT is a Hold.
| LULU | RENT | LULU / RENT | |
| Capitalization | 11B | 83M | 13,253% |
| EBITDA | 2.52B | 101M | 2,493% |
| Gain YTD | -52.375 | -69.027 | 76% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.15 | 0.19 | 4,233% |
| Revenue | 11.1B | 350M | 3,171% |
| Total Cash | 1.39B | 37.1M | 3,747% |
| Total Debt | 2.14B | 197M | 1,087% |
LULU | RENT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RENT's Valuation (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LULU (76) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that RENT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LULU’s over the last 12 months.
RENT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LULU (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that RENT’s stock grew similarly to LULU’s over the last 12 months.
LULU's SMR Rating (33) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for RENT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew significantly faster than RENT’s over the last 12 months.
LULU's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as RENT (86) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew similarly to RENT’s over the last 12 months.
LULU's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as RENT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew similarly to RENT’s over the last 12 months.
| LULU | RENT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LULU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RENT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LULU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RENT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LULU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RENT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LULU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RENT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LULU (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -1.63% price change this week, while RENT (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was -35.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -3.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
LULU is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
RENT is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear Retail (-3.43% weekly)Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
Advertisement
LULU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LULU has been loosely correlated with DBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LULU jumps, then DBI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LULU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LULU | 100% | +2.16% | ||
| DBI - LULU | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| SFIX - LULU | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| CURV - LULU | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| SHOE - LULU | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| BOOT - LULU | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.64% | ||
More | ||||