Advertisement
LVS vs MGM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Las Vegas Sands (LVS) vs. MGM Resorts (MGM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LVS has delivered stronger year-to-date returns of approximately 11.7% compared to MGM's 8%, reflecting robust momentum in recent market activity.
- LVS trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 24.3 versus MGM's 51.8, suggesting relatively better valuation.
- Both stocks benefit from the gaming sector's recovery, but LVS shows superior one-year performance at over 78% gain against MGM's 36%.
- LVS boasts a larger market capitalization of $38.4 billion, indicating greater scale than MGM's $10.8 billion.
- Recent analyst targets suggest upside potential for both, with LVS at $69.30 and MGM at $42.83 on average.
Introduction
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) and MGM Resorts International (MGM) stand as leading players in the global gaming and hospitality industry, both capitalizing on recovering travel demand and casino revenues. This stock comparison examines their business models, recent performance, and market positioning, offering insights for traders eyeing sector momentum and investors assessing relative value in consumer discretionary stocks. With international exposure for LVS and a domestic focus enhanced by digital betting for MGM, the analysis highlights key contrasts amid evolving market conditions.
LVS Overview and Recent Performance
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) operates integrated resorts primarily in Macao and Singapore, following the 2022 sale of its Las Vegas assets. The company emphasizes high-end gaming, conventions, and hospitality, with key properties like Marina Bay Sands driving revenue. In recent weeks, LVS shares have shown resilience, trading around $57 with year-to-date gains near 11.7% and one-year returns exceeding 78%. Sentiment has been bolstered by anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings, expected at $0.76 EPS and $3.31 billion revenue, alongside a CEO transition to Patrick Dumont and positive analyst commentary on momentum and value. Broader recovery in Asian markets has supported performance, though high debt levels remain a watchpoint.
MGM Overview and Recent Performance
MGM Resorts International (MGM) manages a portfolio of Las Vegas Strip properties including Bellagio and MGM Grand, complemented by regional casinos and the BetMGM online sports betting platform. The company focuses on gaming, lodging, and entertainment with growing digital revenue streams. Over recent market activity, MGM shares have hovered near $39, posting year-to-date returns of about 8% and one-year gains of 36%. Key influences include BetMGM's steady Q1 updates, new all-inclusive packages at Luxor and Excalibur, and sales structure enhancements, though revenue outlooks were tempered. Investor sentiment reflects optimism for events and renovations but caution on profitability margins.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of over 350, selected for their suitability in current market conditions across thousands of tickers. These bots showcase diverse strategies, including swing trading, trend following, and multi-agent approaches on timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to 167.82%, win rates ranging 53.91% to 87.72%, and profit factors as high as 11.70, with examples like semiconductor-focused bots achieving 96-97% returns and 65-68% win rates. Whether targeting small-caps, energy, or aerospace, these bots offer varied risk-reward profiles. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to identify tools aligning with your trading style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
LVS and MGM operate in the casino sector but diverge in geographic focus: LVS leverages international mass-market growth in Asia, while MGM emphasizes U.S. Strip dominance and online betting via BetMGM. Growth drivers for LVS include Asian tourism rebound and earnings momentum, contrasting MGM's digital expansion amid slower Vegas trends. Recent momentum favors LVS with superior returns, though MGM offers higher beta (1.35 vs. 0.89) for volatility plays. Both face risks from high debt-to-equity ratios over 800% and economic sensitivity, but LVS exhibits stronger profit margins (12.5% vs. 1.2%) and market sentiment via higher analyst targets relative to price.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward LVS due to its consistent trend strength, superior relative performance, attractive valuation, and upcoming catalysts like Q1 earnings. While MGM holds potential in digital growth, LVS's stability and momentum position it favorably in the near term, though market shifts could alter probabilities.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVS is a Buy and MGM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LVS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LVS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MGM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LVS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MGM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LVS (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while MGM (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +2.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +2.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
LVS is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
MGM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+2.91% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| LVS | MGM | LVS / MGM | |
| Capitalization | 33B | 12.4B | 266% |
| EBITDA | 4.79B | 1.67B | 286% |
| Gain YTD | -22.737 | 33.242 | -68% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.35 | 66.60 | 28% |
| Revenue | 13.7B | 17.7B | 77% |
| Total Cash | 3.33B | 2.29B | 145% |
| Total Debt | 15.7B | 31.3B | 50% |
LVS | MGM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 6 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 41 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LVS's Valuation (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MGM (76). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to MGM’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LVS (100). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's SMR Rating (13) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGM (80). This means that LVS’s stock grew significantly faster than MGM’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVS (59). This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVS’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for LVS (75). This means that MGM’s stock grew significantly faster than LVS’s over the last 12 months.
| LVS | MGM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 62% |
Advertisement
LVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | 100% | -1.84% | ||
| WYNN - LVS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MLCO - LVS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| MGM - LVS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| BRSL - LVS | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| INSE - LVS | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||