Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LYFCX vs SHSKX
LYFCX vs SHSKX Comparison
Open Charts LYFCX vs SHSKX
LYFCX vs SHSKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LYFCX vs. SHSKX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYFCX is a Hold and SHSKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSKX has more cash in the bank: 6.21B vs. LYFCX (47.8M). LYFCX pays higher dividends than SHSKX: LYFCX (0.62) vs SHSKX (0.40). LYFCX was incepted earlier than SHSKX: LYFCX (7 years) vs SHSKX (10 years). LYFCX (3.08) is less costly to investors than SHSKX (0.75). LYFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. SHSKX (43.00). LYFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSKX: LYFCX (2500) vs SHSKX (5000000). LYFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.71 vs. SHSKX (9.27). LYFCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.71 vs. SHSKX (-12.48).
| LYFCX | SHSKX | LYFCX / SHSKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.41 | 0.75 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.08 | 0.75 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.226 | 0.184 | 8,265% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.8M | 6.21B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.40 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.71 | 9.27 | 417% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.95 | 3.94 | 1,014% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | -12.48 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.21 | - |