Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LYFCX vs SHSKX
LYFCX vs SHSKX Comparison
Open Charts LYFCX vs SHSKX
LYFCX vs SHSKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LYFCX vs. SHSKX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYFCX is a Hold and SHSKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSKX has more cash in the bank: 6.48B vs. LYFCX (48.8M). LYFCX pays higher dividends than SHSKX: LYFCX (0.66) vs SHSKX (0.42). LYFCX was incepted earlier than SHSKX: LYFCX (7 years) vs SHSKX (10 years). LYFCX (2.88) is less costly to investors than SHSKX (0.75). LYFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. SHSKX (43.00). LYFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSKX: LYFCX (2500) vs SHSKX (5000000). LYFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.06 vs. SHSKX (12.42). LYFCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.04 vs. SHSKX (-11.33).
| LYFCX | SHSKX | LYFCX / SHSKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 0.75 | 328% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.88 | 0.75 | 384% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.839 | 2.763 | 754% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.8M | 6.48B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.42 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.06 | 12.42 | 411% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.08 | 6.08 | 660% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.04 | -11.33 | -283% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement