Advertisement
LZ vs TRI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? LegalZoom (LZ) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LZ operates an online platform for legal and compliance services aimed at small businesses and consumers, while TRI provides specialized information, analytics, and news services primarily to professionals in legal, tax, and financial sectors.
- In recent market activity, LZ shares have traded near $7.87 with a year-to-date decline of approximately 20.75%, reflecting pressure amid broader sector volatility.
- TRI shares have traded near $98.13, delivering year-to-date gains of roughly 23.84% and demonstrating relative resilience supported by strategic portfolio adjustments.
- Both companies are scheduled to report second-quarter 2026 results on August 5, 2026, creating a near-term focal point for investors monitoring execution and guidance.
- TRI has pursued AI integration and a joint venture involving its Global Print business, contrasting with LZ emphasis on subscription growth and cost management.
- Sector exposure differs notably, with LZ tied more closely to consumer and small-business sentiment and TRI benefiting from recurring demand for professional-grade data and tools.
Introduction
LegalZoom (LZ) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) represent distinct segments within the broader information and professional-services landscape. LZ focuses on accessible online legal formation and compliance tools, whereas TRI delivers high-value content, analytics, and workflow solutions to institutional clients. This comparison appeals to traders and investors evaluating relative performance between a smaller-cap growth-oriented name and a larger, more established information-services provider. Market participants may use the analysis to assess differences in business stability, recent momentum, and positioning ahead of upcoming earnings releases.
LZ Overview and Recent Performance
LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) operates an online platform that supports legal, compliance, and business-management needs for small businesses and consumers in the United States. Its offerings include business formation, intellectual-property filings, estate planning, and subscription-based services such as registered-agent and compliance concierge. In recent market activity, shares have traded near $7.87 following a year-to-date decline of approximately 20.75%. Sentiment has been influenced by ongoing subscription-revenue growth, share-repurchase activity, and analyst commentary around valuation. The company’s upcoming second-quarter 2026 earnings release on August 5, 2026, is expected to provide further clarity on execution and full-year guidance.
TRI Overview and Recent Performance
Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) supplies information, analytics, and news services to professionals in legal, tax, regulatory, and financial markets worldwide. In recent market activity, shares have traded near $98.13, reflecting year-to-date gains of roughly 23.84%. Performance has been supported by recurring revenue streams, continued investment in artificial-intelligence capabilities, and a July 2026 announcement of a joint venture involving its Global Print business. The company also reported modest engineering-role reductions as part of efficiency initiatives. Investors will monitor the August 5, 2026, second-quarter earnings release for updates on organic growth and margin trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform’s AI trading bots that have demonstrated strong alignment with prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers, yet only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for current environments earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker universes, with many exhibiting win rates between 55% and 75% or annualized returns varying by configuration. This diversity allows users to identify approaches that match specific risk tolerances and market outlooks. For additional details, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
LegalZoom (LZ) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) differ substantially in business model and client base. LZ targets consumer and small-business users with transactional and subscription legal services, exposing it to cyclical demand and competitive pricing pressure. TRI serves institutional clients with mission-critical data and workflow tools, supporting more stable, recurring revenue. Recent momentum favors TRI, which has posted positive year-to-date returns amid strategic moves including an artificial-intelligence focus and the print-business joint venture. LZ has faced greater price volatility and a year-to-date decline. Risk factors for LZ include sensitivity to economic conditions affecting small-business formation, while TRI contends with integration costs and competitive dynamics in professional information services. Sector exposure places LZ closer to consumer discretionary trends and TRI within defensive information-services demand.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term performance to Thomson Reuters (TRI). The company’s stronger year-to-date returns, recurring-revenue profile, and strategic initiatives in artificial intelligence and portfolio optimization provide a more stable foundation compared with LegalZoom’s (LZ) recent price pressure and narrower client focus. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing market conditions rather than a definitive forecast.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsTo compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZ is a Hold and TRI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TRI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TRI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +3.83% price change this week, while TRI (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +2.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
LZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.29% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| LZ | TRI | LZ / TRI | |
| Capitalization | 999M | 45.7B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 75.9M | 3.35B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -41.239 | -17.026 | 242% |
| P/E Ratio | 64.83 | 27.80 | 233% |
| Revenue | 780M | 7.83B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 183M | 327M | 56% |
| Total Debt | 15.2M | 2.45B | 1% |
TRI | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LZ | TRI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 23 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
LZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZ has been loosely correlated with TRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZ jumps, then TRI could also see price increases.