MA
Price
$488.50
Change
+$4.41 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
427.73B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
R
Price
$263.46
Change
-$1.60 (-0.60%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.26B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MA vs R

MA vs R Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Mastercard (MA) vs. Ryder System (R) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MA (Mastercard) beat Q1 2026 earnings estimates with revenue of $8.4 billion and EPS (earnings per share) of $4.60, though shares dipped amid cautious guidance and geopolitical concerns.
  • R (Ryder System) also exceeded Q1 expectations, posting earnings growth year-over-year and raising its 2026 EPS outlook, fueling strong year-to-date gains of over 31%.
  • MA maintains a premium PE ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) of 28.66, reflecting its stable payments platform, while R's 20.75 PE signals value in logistics recovery.
  • Recent market activity shows R near its 52-week high, outperforming MA, which trades closer to recent lows amid sector rotation.
  • Divergent risks: regulatory pressures for MA, economic cycles for R.

Introduction

Mastercard (MA) and Ryder System (R) represent contrasting opportunities in the financial and transportation sectors. MA, a global payments leader, benefits from digital transaction growth, while R, a logistics provider, capitalizes on supply chain demands. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning to aid investors rotating between growth-oriented tech-finance plays and cyclical industrials. Traders eyeing relative performance or portfolio diversification will find insights into momentum, valuations, and sentiment shifts in today's evolving market environment.

MA Overview and Recent Performance

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) operates a leading global payments network, processing transactions for consumers, merchants, and financial institutions. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $495, near the lower end of the 52-week range ($481-$602), with a market cap exceeding $437 billion. Q1 2026 results highlighted revenue growth to $8.4 billion and EPS of $4.60, surpassing estimates, driven by cross-border volumes and value-added services. However, cautious forward guidance citing Middle East tensions and economic uncertainty pressured sentiment, leading to a post-earnings pullback. Analyst targets average $649, signaling optimism, though YTD returns hover around 13% amid broader fintech rotation.

R Overview and Recent Performance

Ryder System, Inc. (R) provides transportation and logistics solutions, including fleet management, truck rental, and dedicated operations. Shares recently closed near $250, close to the 52-week high ($140-$259), with a $9.7 billion market cap. Recent quarters showed resilience, with Q1 2026 earnings beating expectations on $3.13 billion revenue and improved profitability, prompting an upward revision to full-year EPS guidance. Year-to-date performance exceeds 31%, outperforming peers amid e-commerce and industrial recovery. Elevated volumes and efficiency gains have bolstered sentiment, though fuel costs and freight cycles remain watchful factors for investors.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selected for their adaptability to current market conditions across sectors like semiconductors, industrials, and finance. These bots employ diverse strategies—trend following, swing trading, momentum plays—with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days, boasting impressive stats such as annualized returns up to +163%, win rates reaching 88%, and profit factors over 4.5. For instance, bots targeting volatility ETFs show profit-to-drawdown ratios above 17, while multi-agent systems trade dozens of tickers dynamically. While none focus exclusively on MA or R, their real-time signals suit varied styles. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your trading approach.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MA's asset-light, network-effect business model contrasts R's capital-intensive fleet operations, enabling scalable growth for the former versus volume-driven expansion for the latter. Growth drivers diverge: digital payments and cross-border trends propel MA, while e-commerce logistics and supply chain normalization boost R. Recent momentum favors R with superior YTD returns and proximity to highs, versus MA's stability post-earnings dip. Risk profiles highlight regulatory scrutiny and competition for MA, against economic sensitivity and fuel volatility for R. Sector exposure positions MA defensively in fintech, R cyclically in industrials, with market sentiment tilting toward value amid rotation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI currently favors R over MA, based on stronger recent momentum, YTD outperformance, and raised guidance signaling catalysts in logistics recovery. While MA offers trend consistency and analyst upside, R's relative positioning in a cyclical upswing provides higher probability for near-term gains, per observable factors like valuation discounts and sector tailwinds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MA vs. R commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MA is a StrongBuy and R is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (MA: $484.09 vs. R: $265.06)
Brand notoriety: MA: Notable vs. R: Not notable
MA represents the Savings Banks, while R is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MA: 104% vs. R: 83%
Market capitalization -- MA: $427.73B vs. R: $10.26B
MA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $427.73B. R’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $10.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $621.11B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $68.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $30.87B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $9.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • R’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, R is a better buy in the long-term than MA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while R’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • R’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the short-term than R.

Price Growth

MA (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.33% price change this week, while R (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -4.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

MA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

R is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.05% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.45% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MA($428B) has a higher market cap than R($10.3B). MA has higher P/E ratio than R: MA (28.01) vs R (22.01). R YTD gains are higher at: 39.634 vs. MA (-14.929). MA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.3B vs. R (3.31B). MA has more cash in the bank: 8.22B vs. R (182M). R has less debt than MA: R (8.72B) vs MA (19B). MA has higher revenues than R: MA (33.9B) vs R (12.7B).
MARMA / R
Capitalization428B10.3B4,155%
EBITDA21.3B3.31B644%
Gain YTD-14.92939.634-38%
P/E Ratio28.0122.01127%
Revenue33.9B12.7B267%
Total Cash8.22B182M4,516%
Total Debt19B8.72B218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MA vs R: Fundamental Ratings
MA
R
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1187
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
494
SMR RATING
1..100
852
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7714
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

R's Valuation (14) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for MA (100). This means that R’s stock grew significantly faster than MA’s over the last 12 months.

R's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MA (49). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for R (52). This means that MA’s stock grew somewhat faster than R’s over the last 12 months.

R's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MA (60). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

R's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MA (77). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than MA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
R
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELTK9.470.06
+0.60%
Eltek Ltd
WSE10.84N/A
N/A
Wise Group Plc
OVID2.25-0.02
-0.88%
Ovid Therapeutics
MLCO5.32-0.22
-3.89%
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
BKHAU12.11-1.89
-13.50%
Black Hawk Acquisition Corp

MA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MA has been closely correlated with V. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MA jumps, then V could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MA
1D Price
Change %
MA100%
-1.16%
V - MA
85%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
OBDC - MA
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
AER - MA
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
OCSL - MA
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
R - MA
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
More