MA
Price
$547.60
Change
+$7.92 (+1.47%)
Updated
Apr 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
446.3B
One day until earnings call
WU
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.21 (-2.08%)
Updated
Apr 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.7B
91 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MA vs WU

Header iconMA vs WU Comparison
Open Charts MA vs WUBanner chart's image
Mastercard
Price$547.60
Change+$7.92 (+1.47%)
Volume$19.76K
Capitalization446.3B
Western Union Company (The)
Price$9.90
Change-$0.21 (-2.08%)
Volume$132.43K
Capitalization4.7B
MA vs WU Comparison Chart
Loading...
MA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MA vs. WU commentary
May 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MA is a StrongBuy and WU is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2025
Stock price -- (MA: $539.68 vs. WU: $10.11)
Brand notoriety: MA: Notable vs. WU: Not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MA: 65% vs. WU: 157%
Market capitalization -- MA: $446.3B vs. WU: $4.7B
MA [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $446.3B. WU’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the long-term than WU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the short-term than WU.

Price Growth

MA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.34% price change this week, while WU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

MA is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

WU is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.16% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MA($446B) has a higher market cap than WU($4.7B). MA has higher P/E ratio than WU: MA (40.44) vs WU (8.18). MA YTD gains are higher at: 2.804 vs. WU (-2.477). MA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. WU (1.04B). MA has more cash in the bank: 9.18B vs. WU (3.22B). WU has less debt than MA: WU (2.67B) vs MA (15.7B). MA has higher revenues than WU: MA (25.1B) vs WU (4.36B).
MAWUMA / WU
Capitalization446B4.7B9,485%
EBITDA15B1.04B1,449%
Gain YTD2.804-2.477-113%
P/E Ratio40.448.18494%
Revenue25.1B4.36B576%
Total Cash9.18B3.22B285%
Total Debt15.7B2.67B589%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MA vs WU: Fundamental Ratings
MA
WU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1612
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
1112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4795
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WU's Valuation (25) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for MA (94). This means that WU’s stock grew significantly faster than MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WU (100). This means that MA’s stock grew significantly faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

MA's SMR Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (12). This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (57). This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

MA's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WU (95). This means that MA’s stock grew somewhat faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAWU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFLI0.640.07
+11.51%
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp
LWAY23.750.54
+2.33%
Lifeway Foods
TCBK39.040.43
+1.11%
TriCo Bancshares
UBSI34.410.21
+0.61%
United Bankshares
TRP50.22-0.03
-0.06%
TC Energy Corp

WU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WU has been loosely correlated with OCSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WU jumps, then OCSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WU
1D Price
Change %
WU100%
-0.49%
OCSL - WU
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
ECPG - WU
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
SLM - WU
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
MA - WU
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
UHAL - WU
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More