MAGN vs SEOJF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAGN is a StrongBuy and SEOJF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAGN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEOJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAGN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SEOJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAGN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MAGN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MAGN (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -18.16% price change this week, while SEOJF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -5.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAGN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pulp & Paper (-5.70% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
| MAGN | SEOJF | MAGN / SEOJF | |
| Capitalization | 90.3M | 9.54B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 56.9M | 1.96B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | -17.666 | 2.462 | -718% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.82 | 9.45 | 622% |
| Revenue | 1.39B | 10.9B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 50.3M | 1.97B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 865M | 5.13B | 17% |
MAGN | SEOJF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAGN's Valuation (8) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEOJF (41) in the null industry. This means that MAGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.
MAGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOJF (100) in the null industry. This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.
SEOJF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGN (93) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that SEOJF’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.
SEOJF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGN (87) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that SEOJF’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.
MAGN's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOJF (28) in the null industry. This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.
| MAGN | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
MAGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAGN and MATV have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAGN and MATV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGN | 100% | -12.36% | ||
| MATV - MAGN | 33% Poorly correlated | -7.78% | ||
| SLVM - MAGN | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.05% | ||
| MONDY - MAGN | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.94% | ||
| MERC - MAGN | 17% Poorly correlated | -4.17% | ||
| SEOAY - MAGN | 16% Poorly correlated | -7.10% | ||
More | ||||
SEOJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SEOJF and HLMMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEOJF and HLMMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEOJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEOJF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HLMMF - SEOJF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UPMMY - SEOJF | 4% Poorly correlated | -5.77% | ||
| UPMKF - SEOJF | 4% Poorly correlated | -8.55% | ||
| WBNEF - SEOJF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MAGN - SEOJF | 1% Poorly correlated | -12.36% | ||
More | ||||