MAGN
Price
$12.01
Change
+$0.07 (+0.59%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
427.56M
88 days until earnings call
SEOJF
Price
$8.56
Change
-$0.93 (-9.80%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAGN vs SEOJF

Header iconMAGN vs SEOJF Comparison
Open Charts MAGN vs SEOJFBanner chart's image
Magnera
Price$12.01
Change+$0.07 (+0.59%)
Volume$755.99K
Capitalization427.56M
Stora Enso Oyj
Price$8.56
Change-$0.93 (-9.80%)
Volume$164
Capitalization6.75B
MAGN vs SEOJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAGN vs. SEOJF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAGN is a Hold and SEOJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MAGN: $12.01 vs. SEOJF: $8.56)
Brand notoriety: MAGN and SEOJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAGN: 118% vs. SEOJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MAGN: $427.56M vs. SEOJF: $6.75B
MAGN [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $427.56M. SEOJF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $6.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAGN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEOJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAGN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEOJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MAGN and SEOJF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAGN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MAGN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

MAGN (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -3.15% price change this week, while SEOJF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAGN is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.56% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEOJF($6.75B) has a higher market cap than MAGN($428M). SEOJF YTD gains are higher at: -12.205 vs. MAGN (-33.902). SEOJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 588M vs. MAGN (67.1M). SEOJF has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. MAGN (276M). MAGN has less debt than SEOJF: MAGN (2.05B) vs SEOJF (5.68B). SEOJF has higher revenues than MAGN: SEOJF (9.37B) vs MAGN (1.31B).
MAGNSEOJFMAGN / SEOJF
Capitalization428M6.75B6%
EBITDA67.1M588M11%
Gain YTD-33.902-12.205278%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.31B9.37B14%
Total Cash276M1.57B18%
Total Debt2.05B5.68B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAGN vs SEOJF: Fundamental Ratings
MAGN
SEOJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6641
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8579
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1035
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAGN's Valuation (5) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOJF (30) in the null industry. This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

MAGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOJF (100) in the null industry. This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

SEOJF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGN (96) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that SEOJF’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

SEOJF's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGN (85) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that SEOJF’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

MAGN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOJF (35) in the null industry. This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to SEOJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGNSEOJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRF7.92N/A
N/A
Cornerstone Total Return Fund
VSDA54.07-0.04
-0.06%
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
ZFEB24.76-0.02
-0.08%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrFeb
EHLS22.22-0.04
-0.17%
Even Herd Long Short ETF
SMN13.14-0.18
-1.38%
ProShares UltraShort Materials

MAGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAGN and MATV have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAGN and MATV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAGN
1D Price
Change %
MAGN100%
+0.59%
MATV - MAGN
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
SLVM - MAGN
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
SUZ - MAGN
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
MONDY - MAGN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
MERC - MAGN
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
More

SEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEOJF and HLMMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEOJF and HLMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEOJF
1D Price
Change %
SEOJF100%
N/A
HLMMF - SEOJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
UPMKF - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBNEF - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAGN - SEOJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
More