Advertisement
HLF vs MAMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLF is a Buy and MAMA is a Buy.
HLF in upward trend: 10-day moving average broke above 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026
The 10-day moving average for HLF crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
HLF moved above its 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +2.89% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HLF advanced for three days, in 201 of 276 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 138 of 187 cases where HLF Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 74%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for HLF moved out of overbought territory on October 19, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 25 of the 29 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 86%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 26, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on HLF as a result. In 68 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for HLF turned negative on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 82%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HLF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
HLF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 3 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 28 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-2.955) is normal, around the industry mean (1.736). P/E Ratio (8.468) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.461). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.120) is also within normal values, averaging (8.458). Dividend Yield (0.045) settles around the average of (0.056) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.241) is also within normal values, averaging (4.925).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HLF’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HLF’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
MAMA sees its Stochastic Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory
On October 27, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for MAMA moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 57 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 51 of the 57 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 89%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 28, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MAMA as a result. In 85 of 103 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MAMA just turned positive on October 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where MAMA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 39 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Following a +6.12% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MAMA advanced for three days, in 231 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
MAMA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 50-day moving average for MAMA moved below the 200-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MAMA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
The Aroon Indicator for MAMA entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MAMA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 93 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.664) is normal, around the industry mean (1.736). MAMA's P/E Ratio (72.278) is considerably higher than the industry average of (6.461). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.370) is also within normal values, averaging (8.458). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.056) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.987) is also within normal values, averaging (4.925).
HLF | MAMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLF's Valuation (28) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMA (93) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's SMR Rating (6) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAMA (78) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as MAMA (61) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAMA (76) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
| HLF | MAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while MAMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MAMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MAMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
HLF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -2.41% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +1.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.11%.
Reported Earning Dates
HLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
MAMA is expected to report earnings on Dec 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-1.58% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
Advertisement
HLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| USNA - HLF | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.91% | ||
| BGS - HLF | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| CENT - HLF | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| NOMD - HLF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| NAGE - HLF | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||
MAMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and HLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and HLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAMA | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| HLF - MAMA | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| DAR - MAMA | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| NOMD - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| LW - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| CENT - MAMA | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||