MB
Price
$4.05
Change
+$0.01 (+0.25%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
69.48M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHAK
Price
$62.18
Change
+$3.58 (+6.11%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.51B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MB vs SHAK

MB vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MB vs. SHAK commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MB is a Hold and SHAK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MB: $4.05 vs. SHAK: $62.18)
Brand notoriety: MB: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MB: 4% vs. SHAK: 104%
Market capitalization -- MB: $69.48M vs. SHAK: $2.51B
MB [@Restaurants] is valued at $69.48M. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $193.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MB is a better buy in the long-term than SHAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the short-term than MB.

Price Growth

MB (@Restaurants) experienced а -14.74% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was +14.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.13% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($2.51B) has a higher market cap than MB($69.5M). SHAK has higher P/E ratio than MB: SHAK (63.45) vs MB (24.65). SHAK YTD gains are higher at: -23.395 vs. MB (-43.198).
MBSHAKMB / SHAK
Capitalization69.5M2.51B3%
EBITDAN/A180M-
Gain YTD-43.198-23.395185%
P/E Ratio24.6563.4539%
RevenueN/A1.49B-
Total CashN/A314M-
Total DebtN/A937M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHAK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COPY15.190.08
+0.53%
Tweedy, Browne Insider + Value ETF
EFT10.760.03
+0.28%
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
KAUG28.700.02
+0.09%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Aug
BRLN50.65-0.15
-0.30%
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF
PFFD18.55-0.10
-0.54%
Global X US Preferred ETF

MB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MB and BTBD have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MB and BTBD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MB
1D Price
Change %
MB100%
+0.25%
BTBD - MB
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
SBUX - MB
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
SHAK - MB
14%
Poorly correlated
+6.11%
BROS - MB
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
RAVE - MB
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
+6.11%
FRSH - SHAK
57%
Loosely correlated
+4.54%
BROS - SHAK
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
CAVA - SHAK
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
BJRI - SHAK
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
CAKE - SHAK
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
More