MB
Price
$5.59
Change
+$0.05 (+0.90%)
Updated
Jun 23, 01:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.9M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHAK
Price
$54.16
Change
-$1.55 (-2.78%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.18B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MB vs SHAK

MB vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MB vs. SHAK commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MB is a StrongBuy and SHAK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (MB: $5.54 vs. SHAK: $55.71)
Brand notoriety: MB: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MB: 28% vs. SHAK: 62%
Market capitalization -- MB: $95.04M vs. SHAK: $2.25B
MB [@Restaurants] is valued at $95.04M. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $191.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MB is a better buy in the long-term than SHAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the short-term than MB.

Price Growth

MB (@Restaurants) experienced а -7.67% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was -4.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-3.48% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($2.19B) has a higher market cap than MB($95.9M). SHAK has higher P/E ratio than MB: SHAK (56.85) vs MB (24.65). MB YTD gains are higher at: -22.300 vs. SHAK (-31.366).
MBSHAKMB / SHAK
Capitalization95.9M2.19B4%
EBITDAN/A180M-
Gain YTD-22.300-31.36671%
P/E Ratio24.6556.8543%
RevenueN/A1.49B-
Total CashN/A314M-
Total DebtN/A937M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHAK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOLT31.942.78
+9.53%
2X Solana ETF
GSEW93.580.41
+0.44%
Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF
TESL16.240.02
+0.13%
Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF
PSFO34.54-0.04
-0.12%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF
BUSA38.95-0.05
-0.13%
Brandes U.S. Value ETF

MB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MB and BTBD have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MB and BTBD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MB
1D Price
Change %
MB100%
-3.48%
BTBD - MB
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.08%
SBUX - MB
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
SHAK - MB
14%
Poorly correlated
-5.70%
YUMC - MB
10%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
BROS - MB
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.22%
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
-5.70%
FRSH - SHAK
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
BROS - SHAK
47%
Loosely correlated
-5.22%
CAKE - SHAK
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
CAVA - SHAK
38%
Loosely correlated
-9.31%
BJRI - SHAK
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
More