Ad is loading...
MBFJF
Price
$11.75
Change
+$0.15 (+1.29%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SMFG
Price
$13.96
Change
-$0.33 (-2.31%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MBFJF vs SMFG

Header iconMBFJF vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts MBFJF vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$11.75
Change+$0.15 (+1.29%)
Volume$213.62K
CapitalizationN/A
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$13.96
Change-$0.33 (-2.31%)
Volume$917.8K
CapitalizationN/A
MBFJF vs SMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBFJF vs. SMFG commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBFJF is a Hold and SMFG is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MBFJF: $11.75 vs. SMFG: $13.96)
Brand notoriety: MBFJF and SMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBFJF: 323% vs. SMFG: 74%
Market capitalization -- MBFJF: $96.76B vs. SMFG: $74.81B
MBFJF [@Major Banks] is valued at $96.76B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $74.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBFJF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBFJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBFJF is a better buy in the long-term than SMFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MBFJF (@Major Banks) experienced а +14.63% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was -0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.47% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBFJF($96.8B) has a higher market cap than SMFG($74.8B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than MBFJF: SMFG (13.83) vs MBFJF (11.76). SMFG YTD gains are higher at: 46.283 vs. MBFJF (39.053). SMFG has less debt than MBFJF: SMFG (32.98T) vs MBFJF (47.28T). MBFJF has higher revenues than SMFG: MBFJF (6.06T) vs SMFG (3.98T).
MBFJFSMFGMBFJF / SMFG
Capitalization96.8B74.8B129%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD39.05346.28384%
P/E Ratio11.7613.8385%
Revenue6.06T3.98T152%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.28T32.98T143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBFJF vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
MBFJF
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5044
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1853
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFG's Valuation (51) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MBFJF (63) in the null industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MBFJF (8) in the null industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MBFJF (1) in the null industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to MBFJF’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFG (44) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MBFJF’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

MBFJF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMFG (53) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MBFJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIFY2.690.06
+2.28%
Sify Technologies Ltd
PUK16.130.28
+1.77%
Prudential PLC
PCT11.04-0.10
-0.90%
PureCycle Technologies
IMVT26.63-1.42
-5.06%
Immunovant
VRM4.98-1.58
-24.09%
Vroom

MBFJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBFJF and MUFG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBFJF and MUFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBFJF
1D Price
Change %
MBFJF100%
+1.29%
MUFG - MBFJF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
SMFG - MBFJF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
BBVXF - MBFJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHY - MBFJF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
CMWAY - MBFJF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
-2.31%
MUFG - SMFG
89%
Closely correlated
-3.23%
C - SMFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
SMFNF - SMFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
NABZY - SMFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
BAC - SMFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
More