MBIN
Price
$32.17
Change
+$0.20 (+0.63%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
17 days until earnings call
WSFS
Price
$53.94
Change
+$0.28 (+0.52%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
3B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBIN vs WSFS

Header iconMBIN vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts MBIN vs WSFSBanner chart's image
Merchants Ban
Price$32.17
Change+$0.20 (+0.63%)
Volume$111.67K
Capitalization1.47B
WSFS Financial
Price$53.94
Change+$0.28 (+0.52%)
Volume$214.12K
Capitalization3B
MBIN vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
MBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBIN vs. WSFS commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBIN is a Hold and WSFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MBIN: $32.17 vs. WSFS: $53.94)
Brand notoriety: MBIN and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBIN: 61% vs. WSFS: 69%
Market capitalization -- MBIN: $1.47B vs. WSFS: $3B
MBIN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.47B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBIN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MBIN and WSFS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBIN is a better buy in the short-term than WSFS.

Price Growth

MBIN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($3B) has a higher market cap than MBIN($1.47B). WSFS has higher P/E ratio than MBIN: WSFS (11.77) vs MBIN (7.04). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 2.430 vs. MBIN (-11.003). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. MBIN (15.4M). WSFS has less debt than MBIN: WSFS (303M) vs MBIN (3.83B). WSFS has higher revenues than MBIN: WSFS (1.05B) vs MBIN (665M).
MBINWSFSMBIN / WSFS
Capitalization1.47B3B49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.0032.430-453%
P/E Ratio7.0411.7760%
Revenue665M1.05B63%
Total Cash15.4M1.02B2%
Total Debt3.83B303M1,265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBIN vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
MBIN
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7351
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5041
SMR RATING
1..100
1614
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBIN's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (16) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

MBIN's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (42) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBINWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSURX25.450.25
+0.99%
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure R
MGRRX42.740.39
+0.92%
MFS International Growth R1
BRSPX14.680.10
+0.69%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R1
HMSFX11.700.01
+0.09%
Hennessy Midstream Investor
LCGFX33.54-0.02
-0.06%
William Blair Large Cap Growth I

MBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBIN has been closely correlated with CNOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBIN jumps, then CNOB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBIN
1D Price
Change %
MBIN100%
+0.63%
CNOB - MBIN
70%
Closely correlated
+3.41%
FNB - MBIN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
ASB - MBIN
68%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
WSFS - MBIN
68%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
UBSI - MBIN
67%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
More

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
+0.52%
FNB - WSFS
92%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
UCB - WSFS
92%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
STBA - WSFS
92%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
EFSC - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
FCF - WSFS
90%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
More