MBINM
Price
$25.72
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RBB
Price
$26.68
Change
+$0.30 (+1.14%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
446.41M
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBINM vs RBB

MBINM vs RBB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBINM vs. RBB commentary
Sep 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBINM is a StrongBuy and RBB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 11, 2026
Stock price -- (MBINM: $25.76 vs. RBB: $26.38)
Brand notoriety: MBINM and RBB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBINM: 116% vs. RBB: 68%
Market capitalization -- MBINM: $0 vs. RBB: $451.15M
MBINM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. RBB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $451.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBINM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBB is a better buy in the long-term than MBINM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBINM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBINM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RBB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBINM is a better buy in the short-term than RBB.

Price Growth

MBINM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.55% price change this week, while RBB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

RBB is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBB YTD gains are higher at: 30.478 vs. MBINM (5.724). RBB has more cash in the bank: 23.9M vs. MBINM (19.6M). RBB has less debt than MBINM: RBB (319M) vs MBINM (4.28B). MBINM has higher revenues than RBB: MBINM (709M) vs RBB (133M).
MBINMRBBMBINM / RBB
CapitalizationN/A446M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.72430.47819%
P/E RatioN/A10.86-
Revenue709M133M533%
Total Cash19.6M23.9M82%
Total Debt4.28B319M1,343%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBB: Fundamental Ratings
RBB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBINMRBB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
MBINM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDO3.160.10
+3.27%
Indonesia Energy Corp
UMBFO25.95-0.08
-0.31%
UMB Financial Corp
ELPC12.45-0.07
-0.56%
Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL
ORN9.09-0.14
-1.52%
Orion Group Holdings
NYAX49.17-2.00
-3.91%
Nayax Ltd

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with HWBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then HWBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
+0.35%
HWBK - MBINM
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CNOBP - MBINM
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
FMNB - MBINM
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
BUSEP - MBINM
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
RBB - MBINM
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
More

RBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBB has been closely correlated with GSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBB jumps, then GSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBB
1D Price
Change %
RBB100%
-0.72%
GSBC - RBB
73%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
FMBH - RBB
72%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
PCB - RBB
72%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
HBCP - RBB
71%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
PEBO - RBB
71%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
More