FMNB
Price
$14.40
Change
+$0.09 (+0.63%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
852.1M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBINM
Price
$25.37
Change
-$0.13 (-0.51%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMNB vs MBINM

FMNB vs MBINM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMNB vs. MBINM commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMNB is a Hold and MBINM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FMNB: $14.40 vs. MBINM: $25.37)
Brand notoriety: FMNB and MBINM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMNB: 39% vs. MBINM: 25%
Market capitalization -- FMNB: $852.1M vs. MBINM: $0
FMNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $852.1M. MBINM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMNB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMNB is a better buy in the long-term than MBINM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMNB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBINM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBINM is a better buy in the short-term than FMNB.

Price Growth

FMNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while MBINM (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMNB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMNB YTD gains are higher at: 10.778 vs. MBINM (4.123). FMNB has less debt than MBINM: FMNB (435M) vs MBINM (4.63B). MBINM has higher revenues than FMNB: MBINM (706M) vs FMNB (200M).
FMNBMBINMFMNB / MBINM
Capitalization852MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.7784.123261%
P/E Ratio9.92N/A-
Revenue200M706M28%
Total CashN/A19.6M-
Total Debt435M4.63B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMNB: Fundamental Ratings
FMNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMNBMBINM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
13%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBINM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICBAX20.920.11
+0.53%
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Inv
GSVSX18.01N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Svc
SMVTX14.14N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity I
TISEX24.06N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity R6
RLLGX85.63-1.30
-1.50%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R-6

FMNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMNB has been closely correlated with TMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMNB jumps, then TMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMNB
1D Price
Change %
FMNB100%
+0.63%
TMP - FMNB
79%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
SHBI - FMNB
78%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
BY - FMNB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
MBWM - FMNB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
SRCE - FMNB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
More

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with HWBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then HWBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
-0.51%
HWBK - MBINM
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
CNOBP - MBINM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
FMNB - MBINM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
RBB - MBINM
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
MGYR - MBINM
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More