MBLY
Price
$11.23
Change
-$0.45 (-3.85%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
9.14B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QS
Price
$12.46
Change
-$0.51 (-3.93%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
7.49B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY vs QS

Header iconMBLY vs QS Comparison
Open Charts MBLY vs QSBanner chart's image
Mobileye Global
Price$11.23
Change-$0.45 (-3.85%)
Volume$4.69M
Capitalization9.14B
QuantumScape
Price$12.46
Change-$0.51 (-3.93%)
Volume$23.91M
Capitalization7.49B
MBLY vs QS Comparison Chart in %
MBLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLY vs. QS commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (MBLY: $11.23 vs. QS: $12.46)
Brand notoriety: MBLY and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLY: 87% vs. QS: 50%
Market capitalization -- MBLY: $9.14B vs. QS: $7.49B
MBLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.14B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $7.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the long-term than MBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBLY is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -10.09% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -14.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBLY is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.27% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBLY($9.14B) has a higher market cap than QS($7.49B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 140.077 vs. MBLY (-43.624). QS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -369.67M vs. MBLY (-2.5B). MBLY has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. QS (1B). MBLY has higher revenues than QS: MBLY (1.94B) vs QS (0).
MBLYQSMBLY / QS
Capitalization9.14B7.49B122%
EBITDA-2.5B-369.67M678%
Gain YTD-43.624140.077-31%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.94B0-
Total Cash1.75B1B174%
Total DebtN/A73M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBLY: Fundamental Ratings
MBLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBLYQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INIVX23.900.26
+1.10%
VanEck International Investors Gold A
BALCX38.450.10
+0.26%
American Funds American Balanced C
DLBMX17.00N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Cap Opps A
AIBBX14.85N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small Cap Equity I-2
TIVRX33.03-0.26
-0.78%
Thornburg International Equity R5

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with APTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then APTV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
-3.85%
APTV - MBLY
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.50%
VC - MBLY
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
ALV - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
LEA - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
ALSN - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
More

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-3.93%
SLDP - QS
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.20%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.46%
GGR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
MBLY - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.85%
LIDR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-8.84%
More