Traders and investors monitoring the autonomous vehicle supply chain frequently compare Hesai Group (HSAI) and Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) due to their complementary roles in perception and driver-assistance technologies. Both companies serve automotive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and emerging mobility platforms, making them relevant for those assessing exposure to advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and LiDAR-enabled autonomy. This comparison provides a factual overview of their business models, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning within the sector, assisting market participants in evaluating trade-offs without favoring either security.
Hesai Group (HSAI) develops, manufactures, and sells three-dimensional light detection and ranging (LiDAR) solutions primarily for automotive and robotics applications. The company maintains operations across Mainland China, Europe, North America, and other international markets. In recent weeks, HSAI stock has exhibited price fluctuations consistent with sector-wide movements in autonomous driving components, influenced by upcoming earnings reports and ongoing design win announcements. Market sentiment has been shaped by the company's expansion into additional OEM programs and its dual listing considerations, contributing to periodic volatility amid broader equity market conditions.
Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) develops and deploys autonomous driving technologies and solutions, including eyeQ chips, vision-based ADAS, and related software. The company serves major global automotive manufacturers and has expanded into robotaxi and cloud-enhanced systems. Recent market activity for MBLY reflects responses to its second-quarter results, which included a revenue beat alongside flat year-over-year sales, as well as announcements regarding leadership transitions and new supply agreements. Stock behavior in recent weeks has been influenced by these catalysts and ongoing industry demand for ADAS features.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a selection of AI trading bots from a platform that offers hundreds of such bots trading thousands of different tickers. Only the best-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions appear in this curated section. Available bots demonstrate a range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many showing varying win rates, drawdowns, and profitability metrics tailored to specific assets. Users can explore these options to identify bots aligned with their preferred risk parameters and market focus. Review the Trending AI Robots page for additional details on current selections.
Hesai Group (HSAI) centers its business model on hardware-centric LiDAR production, positioning it as a key supplier for high-resolution sensing in autonomous systems, whereas Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) emphasizes integrated software-hardware solutions with a broader ADAS portfolio. Growth drivers for HSAI include expanding LiDAR adoption in robotics and European OEM programs, while MBLY benefits from established relationships with multiple global manufacturers and cloud-based enhancements. Recent momentum shows both stocks responding to sector news, though MBLY has navigated leadership announcements alongside operational updates. Risk factors differ in geographic concentration, with HSAI more exposed to China-related dynamics and MBLY facing execution risks in scaling robotaxi initiatives. Market sentiment remains tied to autonomous vehicle commercialization timelines for both, creating trade-offs in portfolio allocation between specialized sensor technology and comprehensive autonomy platforms.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, recent earnings positioning, and relative stability in sector catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models indicate a probabilistic preference for MBLY in the current environment due to its demonstrated revenue resilience and diversified OEM exposure. This assessment remains subject to ongoing market developments and does not constitute a recommendation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HSAI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HSAI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBLY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
HSAI (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.89% price change this week, while MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.30%.
MBLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| HSAI | MBLY | HSAI / MBLY | |
| Capitalization | 3B | 7.68B | 39% |
| EBITDA | 522M | 141M | 370% |
| Gain YTD | -14.732 | -13.506 | 109% |
| P/E Ratio | 38.03 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.18B | 2.02B | 158% |
| Total Cash | 5.72B | 1.44B | 396% |
| Total Debt | 963M | N/A | - |
MBLY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HSAI | MBLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 18 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ALBG | 8.09 | 0.91 | +12.65% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF | |||
| KCE | 169.63 | 3.56 | +2.14% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® Cap Mkts ETF | |||
| WTIU | 23.93 | 0.18 | +0.74% |
| MicroSectors™ Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | |||
| CGGE | 35.46 | 0.16 | +0.45% |
| Capital Group Global Equity ETF | |||
| OBTC | 20.53 | N/A | N/A |
| Osprey Bitcoin Trust | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with AUR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then AUR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBLY | 100% | +1.69% | ||
| AUR - MBLY | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| HSAI - MBLY | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.58% | ||
| QS - MBLY | 39% Loosely correlated | +4.91% | ||
| INVZ - MBLY | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| VC - MBLY | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||