| MBOX | SPLV | MBOX / SPLV | |
| Gain YTD | 23.497 | 7.769 | 302% |
| Net Assets | 154M | 7.12B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.25 | 156% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 71.00 | 56% |
| Yield | 1.85 | 2.12 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
| MBOX | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 10 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UPGD | 84.38 | 1.03 | +1.24% |
| Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Imp ETF | |||
| CFO | 82.71 | 0.07 | +0.09% |
| VictoryShares US 500 Enh Vol Wtd ETF | |||
| FBYY | 10.56 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Graniteshares YieldBOOST Meta ETF | |||
| CLOA | 51.88 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| iShares AAA CLO Active ETF | |||
| FCA | 27.20 | -0.30 | -1.11% |
| First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBOX and HPQ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBOX and HPQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBOX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBOX | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| HPQ - MBOX | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| WSO - MBOX | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| MS - MBOX | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
| WSM - MBOX | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| DKS - MBOX | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPLV has been closely correlated with ETR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPLV jumps, then ETR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPLV | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| ETR - SPLV | 76% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| PNW - SPLV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| CMS - SPLV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| AEE - SPLV | 72% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| DUK - SPLV | 71% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||