MBWM
Price
$54.88
Change
+$0.92 (+1.70%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
932.13M
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLBC
Price
$57.60
Change
+$1.80 (+3.23%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
389.66M
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBWM vs PLBC

MBWM vs PLBC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBWM vs. PLBC commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBWM is a StrongBuy and PLBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (MBWM: $53.96 vs. PLBC: $55.92)
Brand notoriety: MBWM and PLBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBWM: 87% vs. PLBC: 120%
Market capitalization -- MBWM: $932.13M vs. PLBC: $389.66M
MBWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $932.13M. PLBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $389.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBWM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePLBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBWM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PLBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than PLBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBWM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PLBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than PLBC.

Price Growth

MBWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while PLBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

PLBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($932M) has a higher market cap than PLBC($390M). PLBC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: PLBC (11.85) vs MBWM (9.67). PLBC YTD gains are higher at: 26.743 vs. MBWM (13.876). PLBC has less debt than MBWM: PLBC (44.7M) vs MBWM (484M). MBWM has higher revenues than PLBC: MBWM (253M) vs PLBC (98.7M).
MBWMPLBCMBWM / PLBC
Capitalization932M390M239%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.87626.74352%
P/E Ratio9.6711.8582%
Revenue253M98.7M256%
Total Cash48.4MN/A-
Total Debt484M44.7M1,083%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM vs PLBC: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
PLBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3543
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2118
SMR RATING
1..100
4652
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4826
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
856

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PLBC (54). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to PLBC’s over the last 12 months.

PLBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (21). This means that PLBC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PLBC (52). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to PLBC’s over the last 12 months.

PLBC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (47). This means that PLBC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

PLBC's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (48). This means that PLBC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBWMPLBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JERCX12.710.08
+0.63%
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate C
HDGRX38.16N/A
N/A
Hartford Dividend and Growth R3
ACAZX51.30N/A
N/A
Alger Capital Appreciation Z
MDEGX18.46-0.07
-0.38%
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Inv A
VVPSX12.46-0.18
-1.42%
Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
+0.39%
SRCE - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
THFF - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
IBCP - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
FRME - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
EFSC - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
More