Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEMX vs RNWHX
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWHX
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. MCEMX (427M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MCEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs MCEMX (0.54). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCEMX (11 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). MCEMX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MCEMX (25.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). MCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.15 vs. RNWHX (23.68). MCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.51 vs. RNWHX (15.35).
| MCEMX | RNWHX | MCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.72 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.72 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.425 | 14.152 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 427M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.15 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.15 | 23.68 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.84 | 49.71 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.51 | 15.35 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.79 | 121.91 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement