Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCEMX vs RNWHX
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCEMX vs RNWHX
MCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. MCEMX (420M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MCEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs MCEMX (0.51). MCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCEMX (11 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). MCEMX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MCEMX (25.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). MCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.22 vs. RNWHX (21.04). MCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.98 vs. RNWHX (16.46).
| MCEMX | RNWHX | MCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.72 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.72 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.207 | 16.415 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 420M | 88.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.15 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.22 | 21.04 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.16 | 52.01 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.98 | 16.46 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.75 | 107.75 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement